AbstractA study by Ioannidis et al. (2024) investigates extreme publishing behavior, defined as publishing over 60 scientific articles in a single year. This phenomenon is attributed to both genuinely prolific authors and those benefiting from consortium agreements or questionable practices like gift authorship. This study uses PubPeer to investigate potential unethical practices among hyperprolific authors in Earth & Environmental Sciences to differentiate genuine productivity from spurious behavior. The study focused on hyperprolific authors, defined as those publishing over 73 papers annually. Using the database used by the Ioannidis et al.’s study, 41 such authors could be found in Earth & Environmental Sciences. Their H-index ranged from 26 to 188, with a median of 102. Hyperprolific behavior increased sharply, from a few authors in 2005 to 22 in 2022. The top hyperprolific authors, including Guangming Zeng, M. Santosh, Mika E.T. Sillanpää, and Yong Sik Ok exhibited extremely high publication rates accompanied by a good number of PubPeer entries. Several authors faced significant PubPeer scrutiny, such as Yong Sik Ok, Jorg Rinklebe, Daniel C.W. Tsang, Ali Shafaqat, Muhammad Rizwan, and M. Santosh, indicating potential concerns about their publication practices. These findings highlight the need for deeper investigation into the practices behind high publication rates to maintain scientific integrity and rigorous authorship standards. IntroductionA new study by Ioannidis et al. 2024 examines the phenomenon of extreme publishing behavior. Extreme publishing defined as having more than 60 scientific articles published in a single year (over 1 article every 6 days). Using Scopus database, from 2000 to 2022 across various countries and scientific fields, the study found 3191 extreme publishing authors were identified outside of Physics and 12624 within Physics.The behavior is attributed to both genuinely prolific authors and those benefiting from consortium agreements or questionable practices like gift authorship. Key findings include: China had the highest number of extreme publishers outside Physics, followed by the USA. Significant increases in extreme publishing were observed in countries like Thailand, Saudi Arabia, Spain, India, Italy, Russia, Pakistan, and South Korea. In 2022, Clinical Medicine had the most extreme publishers outside Physics (n=678). While there is a good number of extreme publishers in Earth & Environmental Sciences (n = 57).The study found extreme publishers represented 4360 of the top 10000 most-cited authors across all sciences. The study highlights the increasing prevalence of extreme publishing and its potential to undermine authorship standards in scientific research. The study found that extreme publishers represented 4360 of the top 10000 most-cited authors across all sciences. This rise in extreme publishing, as noted by Ioannidis et al. 2024, may be due to more lenient authorship practices, evolving norms of co-authorship, or unethical practices such as paper mills. The study did not attempt to identify whether these authors are associated with overtly unethical practices like paper mills or citation cartels, as such characterizations would require in-depth evaluations of individual CVs and meticulous investigative work.While some exceptionally talented scientists may achieve this as head of a lab or director of institute through productivity and collaboration, there is growing concern that spurious and unethical practices, such as gift authorship, paper mills, and citation cartels, may contribute significantly to these high publication rates. To explore these concerns, PubPeer, an online platform for post-publication peer review, serves as a valuable resource.PubPeer allows researchers to comment on and scrutinize published papers, highlighting potential methodological flaws, errors, or ethical issues. By examining the entries on PubPeer for hyperprolific authors in Earth & Environmental Sciences, the study seeks to identify patterns of questionable practices and assess the integrity of the publications. This analysis will help differentiate between genuine scientific contributions and those potentially driven by unethical behavior. Ultimately, the study aims to enhance the understanding of extreme publishing behavior, promote transparency, and uphold the standards of scientific research. MethodsUsing the database used by Ioannidis et al. (2024) and available by Collins et al. (2024). The database of non-physics hyperprolific was downloaded. This study only uses the hyperprolific authors, defined as at a given calendar year if the author had their names listed as an author in more than 1 full article every 5 days, i.e. 73 or more full articles per year. This study only look at authors in Earth & Environmental Sciences.The hyperprolific authors were extracted, and their names were searched in PubPeer. PubPeer is an online platform where scientists and researchers can comment on and discuss published scientific papers. It allows users to provide post-publication peer review by highlighting potential issues such as methodological flaws, errors, or ethical concerns. PubPeer aims to improve the quality and integrity of scientific research by fostering transparency and accountability. ResultsThe database was extracted for hyperprolific authors in Earth & Environmental Sciences. There are 41 authors with publication of 73 to 258 papers per year, a median of 85 papers. These authors are highly cited with H index from 26 to 188, a median of 102. The hyperprolific behaviour started in 2005 with 1-3 authors but jumped to 7 In 2016 and rapidly increased each year 10 in 2019 and 22 in 2022.Appendix 1 displays the 41 hyperprolific authors in Earth & Environmental Sciences and their number of PubPeer Entries. Some authors face significant scrutiny, such as M. Santosh with 244 entries, Jorg Rinklebe with 448 entries, and Muhammad Rizwan with 72 entries, Mika E.T. Sillanpää (77 entries), Yong Sik Ok (180 entries), Daniel C.W. Tsang (93 entries), and Sunil Kumar (140 entries). These high numbers suggest potential concerns about their publication practices and warrant closer examination, with recurring methodological or ethical questions raised by the scientific community.Several authors (13 out of 41) have no PubPeer entries, such as Yongzhen Peng (0 entries) and Philippe Ciais (0 entries). This indicates their work has faced less public scrutiny. Notably, some authors with high PubPeer entries, like Yong Sik Ok, Ki Hyun Kim, Daniel C.W. Tsang, Ali Shafaqat, Muhammad Rizwan, and Jorg Rinklebe, are identified as collaborators, hinting at potential networks of frequent co-authorships and editorial practices that may need further investigation for ethical standards.Table 1 identifies 15 authors with hyperprolific publishing behavior in Earth & Environmental Sciences, characterized by consistently extremely high publication rates between 2000 and 2022. The top authors include Guangming Zeng (Hunan University, China) with 2159 papers, M. Santosh (University of Adelaide, Australia) with 1183 papers and 244 PubPeer entries, and Mika E.T. Sillanpää (University of South Africa) with 993 papers and 77 PubPeer entries. Other notable authors include Yong Sik Ok (Korea University, 730 papers, 180 PubPeer entries), and Yongzhen Peng (Beijing University of Technology, 1167 papers). Several authors have significant PubPeer scrutiny, such as Jorg Rinklebe (Wuppertal University, 448 entries) and M. Santosh, suggesting potential concerns about their publication practices. These findings highlight the need for closer examination of the practices leading to such high publication rates. Author_name N hyperprolific years Mean hyperprolific papers/year Pubs_2000_2022 N Pubpeer entries Affiliation Zeng,Guangming 12 140 2159 2 Hunan University, China Santosh,M. 10 93 1183 244 University of Adelaide, Australia Sillanpää,Mika E.T. 8 91 993 77 University of Johannesberg, South Africa Ok,Yong Sik 6 91 730 180 Korea University, S Korea Peng,Yongzhen 6 80 1167 0 Beijing University of Technology, China Kim,Ki Hyun 5 89 924 36 Hanyang University, China Cao,Junji 4 81 801 1 Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Tsang,Daniel C.W. 4 103 572 93 Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, China Ali,Shafaqat 3 91 490 60 Government College University, Pakistan Guo,Yuming 3 83 470 2 Monash University, Australia Iqbal,Hafiz M.N. 3 114 541 53 Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico Xing,Baoshan 3 78 831 5 University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA Ciais,Philippe 2 99 499.5 0 Université Paris Saclay, France Kumar,Ponnusamy Senthil 2 162 530 27 SSN College of Engineering, India Rinklebe,Jorg 2 89 405 448 Wuppertal University, Germany