loading page

Blade surface pressure measurements in the field and their usage for aerodynamic model validation
  • +1
  • Erik Fritz,
  • Koen Boorsma,
  • Marco Caboni,
  • Andreas Herrig
Erik Fritz
TNO EnergieTransitie

Corresponding Author:e.fritz@tno.nl

Author Profile
Koen Boorsma
TNO EnergieTransitie
Author Profile
Marco Caboni
TNO EnergieTransitie
Author Profile
Andreas Herrig
LM Wind Power AS
Author Profile

Abstract

This study presents results from a long-term measurement campaign on a research wind turbine in the field. Pressure measurements are conducted at 25% blade radius over several months. Together with inflow measurements provided by a LiDAR system, they form an extensive dataset which is used in the validation of numerical aerodynamic models.  The model validation is conducted based on both ten-minute average data as well as time-resolved unsteady data. Initially, it is investigated how representative ten-minute average pressure measurements are of the underlying unsteady aerodynamics. Binned ten-minute average pressure distributions are then analysed together with their numerical counterpart, consisting of a combination of rotor and airfoil level aerodynamic/aeroelastic simulation results using average environmental and operating conditions as input. Finally, time-resolved measurements and simulation results are compared, validating the aeroelastic tools’ capability to reproduce unsteady aerodynamics.  Overall, reasonable agreement is found between numerical simulations and field experiment data showcasing two aspects: Low-fidelity numerical tools remain relevant for simulating modern multi-megawatt wind turbines and long-term pressure measurements provide invaluable means for validating such tools.
Submitted to Wind Energy
25 Apr 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
19 Jun 2024Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
02 Aug 20241st Revision Received
06 Aug 2024Submission Checks Completed
06 Aug 2024Assigned to Editor
06 Aug 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
06 Aug 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
13 Aug 2024Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
16 Aug 20242nd Revision Received
18 Aug 2024Submission Checks Completed
18 Aug 2024Assigned to Editor
18 Aug 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
19 Aug 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
20 Aug 2024Editorial Decision: Accept