1 Introduction:As the global population continues to grow and urbanization accelerates, a substantial portion of undisturbed natural areas is being converted into urban land, leading to a significant reduction in urban green spaces (Sun et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2023). This trend not only exacerbates habitat fragmentation and reduces the living space for species (Zhu et al., 2020; Hu, Zhang, & Li, 2022) but also adversely affects the health of urban residents. It is associated with increased psychological stress (Lin et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2022), a decline in physical and mental health (Kabisch, van den Bosch, & Lafortezza, 2017; Browning, Rigolon, & McAnirlin, 2022), and fewer opportunities for outdoor activities (Schetke et al., 2016; Akpinar, 2016; Kuddus M A et al., 2020). In the context of the current global health crisis, natural experiences in urban green spaces play a crucial role in supporting human well-being and alleviating psychological stress (Lee, & Maheswaran, 2011; Richardson et al., 2013; Nutsford, Pearson, & Kingham, 2013; Carrus et al., 2015; Javadi, & Nasrollahi, 2021). Post-COVID-19, there has been an increased public attention to the natural elements and wilderness features within urban green spaces (Grima et al., 2020; Ugolini F et al., 2021; Lu et al., 2021; Grzyb et al., 2021), reflecting a significant shift in public perception towards wilderness and a preference for more natural, less human-intervened urban wilderness (Colley & Craig, 2019; Cheesbrough, Garvin, & Nykiforuk, 2019; Samus et al., 2022). This shift not only reveals a deepening demand for natural contact and biodiversity conservation post-pandemic but also reflects a heightened emphasis on healthy living environments and psychological well-being (Venter et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2022; Sikorska et al., 2023). However, by 2050, the majority of the population will reside in urban areas, where access to distant wild conservatories is unlikely for many (UN Habitat, 2022), significantly reducing opportunities for natural wilderness encounters (Zhu et al., 2024). Thus, wilderness has become an emerging focus in urban green space planning and management, aiming to create healthier and more sustainable urban environments that meet residents’ profound needs for natural contact.Historically, wilderness has been closely associated with the notion of ”undisturbed” natural relics (Cronon, 1996; Kalamandeen & Gillson, 2007; Dietz et al., 2015). Definitions from prominent entities like the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (Dudley, 2008), the U.S. Wilderness Act (1964), and Wild Europe (2013) conceptualize wilderness as areas relatively untouched by human activity or intervention. While these definitions do not entirely preclude human presence, they emphasize minimizing human impact and preserving natural states and ecological processes (Allan, Venter & Watson, 2017; Zoderer et al., 2020). However, such perspectives are challenging to apply within urban ecosystems where traditional definitions of wilderness overlook the complexities and dynamic processes of urban environments (Kowarik, 2018; Threlfall & Kendal, 2018). Urban areas seldom contain spaces completely free from human influence; urban wilderness results from the interplay between human activities and natural processes (Zefferman et al., 2018; Müller et al., 2018). Furthermore, traditional wilderness definitions struggle to encompass urban residents’ needs for wilderness spaces, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic, which has shifted demands towards urban green spaces exhibiting more wilderness-like characteristics (Sikorska et al., 2023; Giles-Corti et al., 2023). Urban wilderness spaces provide essential ecological services and social functions such as recreation, education, and psychological restoration (Kowarik, 2018; Hunter, Gillespie, & Chen, 2019; Birch, Rishbeth, & Payne, 2020), playing a critical role in promoting physical and mental health and enhancing environmental awareness among city dwellers. Therefore, in urban ecosystems, the concept of urban wilderness needs to be more inclusive, accommodating natural processes and ecosystems influenced by human activities, while recognizing the significance of urban wilderness for urban biodiversity, resident well-being, and ecological service provision (Felappi, 2020; Sikorska et al., 2021; Cao et al., 2022; Zhu et al., 2024). Current research on urban wilderness extends beyond mere conservation to include how urban wilderness spaces can be utilized. Urban outdoor recreation provides residents opportunities to engage with wilderness through activities like camping, hiking, and wildlife observation, which are crucial for health benefits including nature interaction, psychological recovery, strengthening community ties, and enhancing quality of life (Kil, Stein, & Holland, 2014; Li et al., 2022; Samus et al., 2022). Integrating urban wilderness with recreational activities is key to enhancing urban ecological health, improving resident well-being, and promoting sustainable urban development (Luo et al., 2022; Yuan et al., 2024). Accurately identifying urban wilderness and recreational potential areas aids urban planners in crafting effective urban green space strategies, enabling targeted rewilding efforts or development of wilderness recreation activities to create attractive, accessible natural recreational spaces that bolster urban ecological resilience and improve residents’ quality of life.Wilderness mapping research traditionally focuses on identifying and conserving natural areas that remain largely unaffected by human activities (Orsi, Geneletti, & Borsdorf, 2013; Allan, Venter, & Watson, 2017; Cao, Carver, & Yang, 2019). This endeavor not only aims to preserve biodiversity and safeguard critical ecosystem services—such as water resource protection, air quality improvement, and carbon sequestration (Müller et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2024)—but also supports scientific research based on these undisturbed areas and underpins the maintenance of human cultural heritage and spiritual well-being (Bagstad, 2017; Zefferman et al.,2018). Historically, researchers have employed a variety of methods to identify and evaluate wilderness areas, including location-based service data (Ma, & Long, 2020), Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) (Cao, Carver, & Yang, 2019; Zhu et al., 2024; Xu et al., 2024a), Boolean overlay (Cao, Carver, & Yang, 2019; Xu et al., 2024a), ecoacoustic methods (Carruthers-Jones, 2019), and MaxEnt modeling (Ma, & Pan, 2024). These studies typically regard human activity as a disturbance and exclude it from wilderness areas, with some research framing human recreation as a threatening factor to wilderness from a recreation ecology perspective (Marion et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2024b).However, in the context of rapid urbanization, humans are not only integral to urban ecosystems but their recreational activities are also part of ecological interactions that contribute positively to ecological balance and human well-being (Fagerholm, Eilola, & Arki, 2021; Nigussie, Liu, & Yeshitela, 2021). A significant shortcoming in current urban-scale wilderness studies is the failure to fully recognize the constructive role of human activities in the conservation and maintenance of wilderness areas (Zefferman et al., 2018; Zoderer et al., 2020). This overlooks the potential for harmonious coexistence between people and nature within urban environments. The inclusion of human recreational activities within the scope of urban wilderness should be considered (Luo et al., 2022; Yuan et al., 2024). Integrating the interactions between people and the natural wilderness into the wilderness system can help achieve a synergy between recreational activities and conservation goals, thereby enhancing human well-being (Kowarik, 2018; Threlfall & Kendal, 2018).In the rapid urbanization processes of Chinese major first and second-tier cities, there has been an unprecedented high demand for land resources, often prioritizing the development of residential, industrial, and commercial facilities while neglecting the importance of urban green spaces and natural reserves (Chen & Hu, 2015; Zeng et al., 2023). This development model has not only weakened urban biodiversity but also adversely affected residents’ quality of life and well-being (Zhou & Wang, 2011). However, in response to these challenges, the Chinese government has integrated environmental protection into its core development strategy, actively embracing the concept of an ’ecological civilization’ (Zhou et al., 2021; Meng et al., 2021). Through initiatives such as green urban planning, ecological corridors, and national park construction, it aims to protect and restore urban wilderness areas (Hou et al., 2023; Sun et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2019). Despite these efforts, the multifunctionality of urban wilderness areas and their potential for integrated use are often overlooked. Faced with the pressures of limited land resources and economic development, China is striving to find ways to utilize urban wilderness more effectively, moving beyond traditional conservation and restoration to include eco-tourism, nature education, and outdoor recreation (Yuan et al., 2024; Cao et al., 2022; Luo et al., 2022). In this context, exploring the multidimensional utilization of urban wilderness is not only crucial for Chinese own sustainable development but also offers valuable lessons and insights for other countries experiencing rapid urbanization, especially those metropolitan areas facing challenges in balancing ecology with development.This study aims to explore and address three core scientific issues regarding urban wilderness, facilitating the protection and rational use of urban wilderness spaces in line with the needs for sustainable urban development:(1)Re-defining the Concept and Framework of Urban Wilderness: Can a new theoretical framework be constructed that integrates the concepts of urban wilderness conservation with wilderness recreation development, to more comprehensively reflect the multifunctionality of natural spaces within urban environments?(2)Optimizing Urban Wilderness Evaluation Indicators: Given the current limitations in urban wilderness research, this study aims to develop a more precise and practical set of evaluation indicators to support the systematic identification and classification of novel urban wilderness areas. Can this system more effectively map the true state and potential recreation value of urban wilderness?(3)Management Strategies for Urban Novel Wilderness Areas: Based on the newly defined urban wilderness and its evaluation indicators, this research will explore how to formulate management strategies for urban novel wilderness areas with varying degrees of wilderness and recreational potential. The goal is to promote ecological protection, recreational functions, and harmonious coexistence with the urban environment.Through the exploration of these questions, this study expects to provide scientific basis and practical strategies for urban planners and environmental managers. The aim is to promote the sustainable management and utilization of urban wilderness areas, while enhancing urban residents’ opportunities for contact with nature and improving their quality of life.