Jacob MahlanguUniversity of PretoriaPhD: Political Sciences2025Topic:Classical realism and state of the art international relations: US hegemony under donald TrumpAbstractThis study asserts that there is a reemergence and relevance of classical realism in contemporary international relations by investigating U.S. foreign policy under the Trump administration. Extracting from the foundational principles of classical realism — such as the state-centric approach to international politics, imperial power, hierarchy and dominance, balance of power, the nature of war and conflict— the study interrogates the ”America First” agenda by Donald Trump, transactional diplomacy, the U.S acting unilaterally, leading and spearheading international politics. This study makes use of the theoretical overview of realism. This is a descriptive study making use of secondary sources such as newspaper and online articles, websites and journal articles. This is a qualitative study. It makes use of thematic analysis to analyse findings, draw meanings, identify trends, meaning and confirm initial assumptions. This is a desktop study. While often perceived as irregular and unexpected, Trump’s foreign policy, diplomacy, and conduct in international politics demonstrates a nostalgic return to the U.S hegemony in the international order rooted in ruthless self-interest, nationalism, and a rejection of liberal institutionalism. By comparing the U.S’ unilateral behaviour from intergovernmental organizations, anti-immigration policies, tariff impositions on other countries’ products or U.S’ imports, travel bans, aid withdrawal on development aid, military missions focused on tracing and eliminating terrorist networks posing a threat to the U.S, interest in space travel and technological leadership with the classical elements and key features of realism - the study makes an argument that the U.S under Trump is a return to the state of the art realism perspective of international relations with strategic methods of engaging in competition with other countries while avoiding war, prioritising protectionism or mercantilism, while attributing itself a watchdog role which holds other states accountable for not only their international conduct but also domestic politics.IntroductionFollowing the end of the world wars, the international order has been examined and analysed by using intergovernmental organizations and international institutions as a unit. This helped because such entities regulated the behaviour of states, ensured their actions are captured by them, regulated their behaviour, promoted democratic and collective decision-making, enforced legal frameworks, the rule of law and also transformed the classical state-centric approach from a violent, competitive, unstructured, unconventional, anarchical and rogue to promoting the ideals and values of peace and cooperation. This meant that states could be examined in a controlled setting guided by laws, rules, processes and structures. However, in today’s era these entities have become ineffective in reducing state actions to within their confines, though these entities are still in existence and states are still members with obligations from them, states tend to act outside these entities.Although these entities promoted cooperation, democratic participation in decision-making and states acting as a collective, they were and still attributed certain positions, power and privileges to powerful states based on their technology, wealth and military prowess. This was done so that such states would not find such entities to be an inconvenience and voluntarily agree to operate under such entities. This also ensured that the entities ideological ambitions, values and beliefs about international politics did not distort the true reality of international politics. Using the United States as an example, Donald Trump’s return to office has redirected the focus of examining international politics from intergovernmental organizations such as the United Nations to a focus in powerful states. One may argue that it was actually Russia’s war with Ukraine which introduced this refocus as Russia acted disobedient to international law, acted unilaterally internationally and intentionally acted rebellious from the United Nations. However, the United States of America has cemented this refocus, because in Russia’s case, the intergovernmental organization superiority over a state prevailed while in the United States’ case, it seems the state is narrating international relations and dictating the behaviour of other states and therefore the international system apart fout of the intergovernmental organization.Trump’s U.S has reintroduced the realist approach to the international liberal order, premised and prioritising: nationalism and unilateralism. The U.S has withdrawn from international organizations and agreements such as the World Health Organization and Paris Climate Agreement. Demonstrated its influence and reasserted its hegemonic position by using its foreign aid as a tool. Attributed to itself a role of mediator in diplomatic affairs exemplified by its engagement in the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Engaging in unconventional warfare with other countries such as economic competition using trade and tariff policies. The U.S promotes nationalism, patriotism and discourages liberalisation exemplified by its immigration laws. This study argues that the current international system is rooted on the ideologies, ambitions and strategic decisions of powerful states. Despite progressive and left-leaning critical theories having been adopted and promoted in international politics with a major shift away from the dominant mainstream theories in the discipline and practice of international politics, current events, actions and behaviours of powerful states in the international politics has reinforced the idea that such theories remain dominant, persistent, the status quo and unaffected by all attempts to challenge them. Based on the premise and supposition that states are interested in power and operate on self-interest within an anarchic international order. Hegemonic powerful states in the hierarchy and balance of power of the international system tend to act in the manner which reintroduces and reinforces the existence and continuation of the realist school of thought and perspective regarding international politics either based on nostalgia or for other reasons. In recent years, Trump’s United States has spearheaded international politics through diplomacy, foreign policy focus to a renewed scholarly interest in the relevance of classical realism to eh study of international politics or modern international relations.Trump’s doctrine and Agenda of “America First” is made up of features that highlight Unilateral action. Transactional diplomacy, transactional diplomacy, and a move away from the norms of the international liberal order which reinvigorate, reinforce, and reflects an empirical case which describes the current international system by operationalising the central tenets of classical realist thought. From the U.S. opting out of multilateral agreements and international institutions to imposing tariffs, placing travel bans, and cutting development aid, the Trump’s United States portrays a strategic assertion of power and national interest. These actions suggest a new status, perspective and form of U.S. hegemony—one that embraces competition, prioritizes protectionism, and aims to reshape the global order in accordance with American priorities or which places the U.S as the global leader able to independently control, reward and punish other states’ conduct both internationally and domestically if the U.S finds them unsuitable.This study investigates the reemergence and contemporary relevance of classical realism by critically examining U.S. foreign policy under the Trump administration. Drawing from the foundational principles of classical realism—such as state-centrism, imperial dominance, the balance of power, and the inevitability of conflict—the research analyzes how Trump’s conduct on the global stage aligns with and reinvigorates realist theory. Through a qualitative, descriptive, and desktop-based methodology, the study employs thematic analysis to examine secondary sources, including journal articles, news reports, official statements, and policy documents. The aim is to uncover patterns and draw meaning from Trump-era policies that reflect a return to a realist mode of engagement in international affairs.By contextualizing the U.S.’s unilateral behavior—ranging from its disengagement with global institutions to militaristic strategies against non-state threats and an intensified interest in technological supremacy—within the framework of classical realism, the study argues that Trump’s foreign policy marks a significant shift in how American hegemony is projected and justified. Ultimately, this research contributes to the broader discourse on realism in international relations by showing how a historical theory continues to shape and explain the strategic behavior of dominant powers in the 21st century.Theoretical FrameworkClassical RealismIn International Relations, the theory of realism is regarded as one of the dominant theories; under this theory international politics has a more forceful and competitive nature and is dedicated to a self-helping system (Lomia 2020 cited from Sleat 2016: Griffiths, Roach, & Solomon 2016). States are concerned with their own security, act with the intention of fulfilling their self-interest, and struggle for power (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2023). Realism argues that international politics is a domain that has no justice, is rooted in potential and active conflict among states where ethical standards do not apply (StanFord Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2023). Realism assumes that states operate in an anarchical environment, without any authority internationally (Antunes and Camisao 2018). Actions pursued by states are rooted on their relative power in relation to other states (Antunes and Camisao 2018). Realism is pessimistic and stresses on the reappearing trends of power politics as realised by reoccurring wars, rivalries and conflicts (Pashakhanlou 2009 cited from Jackson and Sorenson 2007: 60).Literature ReviewThe U.S’ usage of realism in international politicsAccording to Jones (2025) a blended liberal/realist internationalist foreign policy has been followed by American presidents since the end of the cold war. Trump’s foreign policy approach is rooted on the assumption that the global position of the US is decreasing due to its leadership enabling the country’s exploitation in recent decades by both its enemies and friends (Kohut 2025). Trump’s first term exposed his distrust of international institutions, global organisations and multilateral agreements and his choice for bilateral relations (Kohut 2025). An instance that confirms his lack of belief for globalism, multilateralism and international organizations is his withdrawal from the World Health Organization and climate change agreement (Ataman 2025). Trump’s foreign policy is isolationist as it promotes the imposition of tariffs in opposition to free trade in order to protect and isolate the American economy (McFaul 2025). In his first term Trump practiced and articulated a clear preference for unilateralism, isolationism and realism (McFaul 2025). While Trump’s “America first” agenda implies a realist perspective; his administration possesses features which match the realist paradigm such as: more mercantilism, less common causes (regional, global or continental), more government intervention, big power arrogance, less free trade (Ataman 2025).ResultsU.S’ return to state of the art International RelationsU.S hegemonyOnce the primary champion and architect of multilateralism, the U.S is now abandoning commitments, retreating behind its borders, and hindering trade agreement with its long-standing partners (Liy 2025). Trump’s view is simple: only the strong get to negotiate. Trump believes in applying pressure and having the existing order broken (Liy 2025).Anti-immigration policiesTrump has freezed the resettlement of refugees in their tens of thousands who have been vetted and approved already in their application of relocating to the United States; with this number including 15000 Afghans (Trevizo 2025). Humanitarian parole for immigrants from Haiti, Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela with 500 000 already living in the U.S in legal limbo (Trevizo 2025).Tariff impositionsTrump says tariffs will motivate US consumers to purchase American produced goods, increase the amount of tax raised, and also result in high levels of investment in the US (Clarke 2025).Development aidThe Rationale behind freezing funding is that the “foreign aid industry and bureaucracy are not aligned with American interests and in many cases antithetical to American values (Cullinan 2025).DiscussionThe study investigated if Trump’s foreign policy reintroduces the realism perspective of international politics. The results suggest that there are certain actions taken by Trump which are intended for specific purposes aimed at advantaging the US in the global arena and also which portray its power. For instance, Realism is rooted in powerful states being dominated by weaker states, and the results suggest that Trump used aid withdrawal as a tool to manipulate weaker states to align to US priorities. Realism suggests that states are self-interested or are interested in their own security and the findings support this by providing the actions performed by the US such as imposing tariffs on imports for the intention of domestically raising tax, promoting locally produced goods, and attracting investment. Realism suggests there is no central authority internationally and that international politics is based on an anarchic system, the US actions that support this notion is how the US is acting rogue, breaking out of international organisations, agreements, retreating behind its borders, promoting nationalism, anti-immigration policies and mercantilism.BibliographyAntunes, S & Camisao, I. 2018. Introducing Realism in International Relations Theory. Online. Website: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/27/introducing-realism-in-international-relations-theory/ Date accessed: 25 April 2025Ataman, M. 2025. Alarm in West: Trumpian realism mingles friends and foes. Online. Website: https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/columns/alarm-in-west-trumpian-realism-mingles-friends-and-foes Date accessed: 25 April 2025Clarke, J. 2025. What are tariffs and why is Trump using them? Online. Website: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn93e12rypgo Date accessed: 25 April 2025Cullinan, K. 2025. As US Retreats from Global Health, Africa Looks for New Sources of Financial Support. Online. Website: https://healthpolicy-watch.news/as-us-retreats-from-global-health-africa-looks-for-new-financial-sources/ Date accessed: 25 April 2025Jones, W. J. 2025. Trump, Realism and the Multipolar World. Online. Website: https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2025/02/07/trump-realism-and-the-multipolar-world/ Date accessed: 25 April 2025Kohut, A. 2025. The world according to Trump: the new US administration’s foreign policy vision. Online. Website: https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2025-01-20/world-according-to-trump-new-us-administrations-foreign-policy Date accessed: 25 April 2025Liy, M.V. 2025. Trump, the president unraveling US hegemony. Online. Website: https://english.elpais.com/usa/2025-03-10/trump-the-president-unraveling-us-hegemony.html Date accessed: 25 April 2025Lomia, E. 2020. Political Realism in International Relations: Classical Realism, Neo-realism, and Neo-Classical Realism. International Journal of Social, Political and Economic Research, Vol. 7 (3), pp. 591-600McFaul, M. 2025. Foreign Policy: Where Is Trump Going? Online. Website: https://www.hoover.org/research/foreign-policy-where-trump-going Date accessed: 25 April 2025Pashakhanlou, A.H. 2009. Comparing and Contrasting Classical Realism and Neorealism. Online. Website: https://www.e-ir.info/2009/07/23/comparing-and-contrasting-classical-realism-and-neo-realism/ Date accessed: 25 April 2025StanFord Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2023. Political Realism in International Relations. Online. Website: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/realism-intl-relations/ Date accessed: 25 April 2025Trevizo, P. 2025. Donald Trump’s immigration executive orders: Tracking the most impactful changes. Online. Website: https://www.texastribune.org/2025/02/07/donald-trump-immigration-executive-orders/ Date accessed 25 April 2025