The digital domain has become a core battleground where nation-state cyber actors increasingly deploy sophisticated Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs). This paper explores their Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs), evaluating the efficacy of existing cyber defense frameworks. Drawing from well-documented campaigns-APT28's DNC breach, APT10's Operation Cloud Hopper, and Lazarus Group's WannaCry ransomware this study applies the MITRE ATT&CK and Cyber Kill Chain frameworks to map and analyze adversarial operations. Findings underscore widespread use of stealthy, persistent TTPs leveraging phishing, living-off-the-land techniques, and supply chain compromise. The analysis identifies critical defense gaps in detection, response, and attribution. The paper proposes strategic recommendations including AI-driven behavioral detection, Zero Trust Architecture, and enhanced intelligence-sharing frameworks to improve cyber resilience against evolving state-sponsored threats. The digital landscape has profoundly transformed into a critical domain of conflict, with nation-state cyberattacks posing an escalating and sophisticated threat to global stability and national security. This paper comprehensively investigates the Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) employed by state-sponsored Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) groups and critically evaluates existing defense mechanisms. Utilizing a qualitative, analytical, and interpretivist research design, the study dissects prominent campaigns, including APT28's DNC Hack, APT10's Operation Cloud Hopper, and the Lazarus Group's WannaCry ransomware attack, through the structured lenses of the MITRE ATT&CK framework and the Cyber Kill Chain. Findings reveal the pervasive use of stealth-oriented and persistent TTPs, such as sophisticated spearphishing, credential theft, and exploitation of unpatched vulnerabilities, often leveraging legitimate system functionality and supply chain dependencies. The analysis highlights critical defense gaps, including detection delays, patching failures, and persistent attribution challenges. Importantly, this study reinforces the hypothesis that the consistent use of structured cybersecurity frameworks contributes significantly to effective threat management, particularly MITRE ATT&CK for threat behavior mapping and Zero Trust Architecture for defense implementation, demonstrably enhances detection, attribution, and mitigation capabilities against these evolving threats. Based on these insights, actionable strategic recommendations are proposed, advocating for AI-driven behavior-based detection, robust threat intelligence sharing, and advancement of international cyber norms, thereby contributing to a more proactive and resilient global digital ecosystem.