The Impact of NDIS pricing on Ballarat Disability Providers - AliceJane WebbWe need to firstly understand the policy making environment in order to influence the NDIS/NDA funding knowing who has the power to make decisions and changes is key, develop a well-defined understanding of the issues in order to create a clear unified solution and then advocate and lobby for new NDIS prices and a new Multi Enterprise Agreement. Gaining the attention of policymakers is complex, being able to simplicity present the problem and solution can ease any confusion around the issues raised (Cullerton et al., 2016).We need a proficient and successful NDIS market for disability support services that include:Quality frameworks for servicesFinancially viable for all three stakeholder groupsTraining and development for service provider employeesFair and effective enterprise agreement for service provider employeesTransparent pricing and calculationsEducation/advocacy for clients with a disabilityOur advocacy project will try to achieve these six key areas through a communication strategy that involves social media, talking with politicians, writing journal articles, talking at conferences and supporting other service providers and advocacy groups to join in.Look at his through the stages of the critical reflection model- deconstruct, confront, theorise, and think otherwise (Ramachandran, 2017), each stage of the model has an intention.The four stages look at a critical evaluation of the issue and advocacy strategy. The first two stages look at the meanings and discourses in applying the solution (Henderson & Noble, 2015). The final two staged assist in reconstructing through thinking about other evidence and possibilities on similar and differing topics (Thomas, 1999).The four stages assist in critically rethinking and reflecting academically whilst working through the possible issues and concerns with the implementation (Gur-Ze’ev, Masschelein & Blake, 2001).To deconstruct the issues and practices including problems of practice within this stage we try to understand the various perspectives that exist (Bartesaghi et al., 2018). This requires pulling apart analysis of what has or might happen in practice, especially practice that is taken for granted or have become normalised. Prior to the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), the disability sector had a different structure with three main groups of stakeholders, the customer who pays the bills (government agencies such as the Department of Health and Human Services), consumers who require the services, people with a disability (PWD) and the service providers who design and provide services for the consumers. The NDIS saw changes in many areas, mainly in the government role from the customer who paid the bills for the consumers, to the regulator and policy maker causing several perspective changes (DSS, 2012 & NDIA, 2019). The following table outlines the stakeholders as they are presently and their relevant perspectives and goals.The government perspective of the NDIS is focused on the best possible services for PWD with the least expense and maintaining that Australia wide (DHHS, 2016, & NDIA, 2018). The client perspectives include a service that supports their individual needs, quality of life improvement and freedom to choose and make informed decisions (NDIA, 2019 & DHHS, 2016). Service providers want to look after their employees through training, development, ethical and safe working conditions, to stay financially viable and provide the best possible cost-effective services to PWD (Foster, 2019 & Hubbard, 2019 & Jaworski et al., 2018). With three differing perspectives and goals it is difficult to come together and design the best and most sustainable disability sector.The confronting stage looks at the three perspectives (Government, Provider and Client) and confronts the assumptions underlining practice including an examination of the historical, social and cultural contexts involved (Loja et al., 2013).