Material and methodsAs part of the revision of the Neotropical species of Celtis(Zamengo in prep.), 8,414 specimens were analyzed. Although the collections of different herbaria contain thousands of neotropical specimens of Celtis , only a few herbaria have the true C. iguanaea . With this in mind, we selected 200 specimens of C. iguanaea , as these are the most similar to the native specimens from Curaçao, from which the species was originally described (Appendix 1). The list of examined specimens of the re-established taxa can be found in Appendix 1. All examined specimens are deposited in the following herbaria: ALCB, B, BG, BHCB, BHZB, BR, CAY, CEN, CEPEC, CESJ, CGMS, CTES, E, EAC, ESA, F, FLAS, FUEL, FURB, G, GBH, GFJP, GUA, GUADA, HAL, HOXA, HUA, HUEFS, HUT, IBGE, IBUG, INPA, K, L, LPB, MA, MBM, MBML, MEXU, MO, MVFA, MY, NY, P, PMSP, RADAMBR, RB, S, SI, SP, SPF, TEFH, U, UB, UCS, UFACPZ, UFP, ULBRA, UNAM, UNR, UPCB, US, USM, VIES, and XAL (acronyms are according to Thiers 2024).All of the specimens were macro- and micro-morphologically analyzed. For some characters, we used a Mikoba S2040 magnifying glass with 20X and 40X magnification equipped with LED lights and a camera. We also used a Gadnic USB digital microscope with 40X to 1000X magnification, LED lights, and a camera. Additionally, live plants of C. iguanaeawere observed, photographed, and collected in Curaçao (where it is the only Celtis species ever recorded).For the analysis of the pyrenes, fourteen ripe or dried fruits were cleaned using the method described by Zamengo et al. (2020). After cleaning, the pyrenes were examined and measured with a precision caliper. The morphological terms used are based on Chamorro et al. (2021). The colors are according to Beentje (2010). The distribution map was made using the Q.Gis 3.22.2 program.The names reviewed in the results section are those synonymized withC. iguanaea by Berg and Dahlberg (2001), except forC. spinosa and C. spinosissima that have already been re-established (Zamengo et al. 2020, Chamorro et al. 2021). For nomenclatural considerations we followed the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN, Turland et al. 2018).In this article we only give the taxonomic headings and descriptions ofC. iguanaea and the new combination. The other re-established species have not been described here as a review of all neotropical species is underway (Zamengo in prep. ) and will be published in the future. For the other reestablished species, we highlight the characters that distinguish them from C. iguanaea (Table 3).