Extranodal lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma responding rapidly to Zanubrutinib: A Case SeriesAuthors[1] Mr. Samuel Brown, BA (Cantab.), University of Cambridge Clinical School of Medicinesb2382@cam.ac.ukORCID: 0009-0000-8484-5411[1] Miss Jillian Rusbridge, BA (Cantab.), University of Cambridge Clinical School of Medicinejillian.rusbridge@nhs.netORCID: 0009-0006-1678-1659[2] Professor Dr. George FollowsORCID: tbc[3] Dr Anna Santarsieri MA (Cantab.), MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, MD,ORCID: 0000-0002-4449-2196.Author ContributionsMr SB and Miss JR wrote the initial manuscript with equal contribution, which has been reviewed and edited by Professor GF and Dr AS.Conflicts of InterestNo authors have any conflicts of interest to be declared.ConsentWritten informed consent was obtained from Patients A, B and C to publish this report in accordance with the journal’s patient consent policy.Key Clinical MessageManagement of recurrent or atypical Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma poses a significant therapeutic challenge. Here we demonstrate a case series of three patients with atypical presentations of extranodal lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma that each show remarkable and timely responses to Zanubrutinib with limited side effect profile.Introduction Lymphoplasmacytic lymphomas (LPL) are a rare group of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, involving post-germinal centre B-cell lymphoproliferation with, usually, IgM monoclonal gammopathy. When IgM paraprotein is produced, this disease can be termed Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia (WM) [1]. They are indolent but incurable diseases. The incidence of LPL is reported to be 0.27 and WM 0.36 per 100,000 people in the USA, based on cancer registry data [4]. WM has a median age of onset of 65-70 years [5] and a median survival of 5.3 years for those [6]. More than 95% of WM demonstrate an L265P mutation in the adaptor protein MYD88 (Myeloid Differentiation Primary Response 88) involved in IRAK1 and NF-κB signalling, promoting cell survival. [7] This mutation leads to the constitutive homodimerisation of MYD88 and subsequent recruitment and activation of several intracellular molecules, including Bruton Tyrosine Kinase, as well as PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK1/2. [8]The symptoms of WM are largely due to bone marrow infiltration and associated cytopaenias, but initial presentation commonly includes constitutional symptoms such as weight loss and fatigue [1]. Further common presentations of WM include moderate hepatosplenomegaly and lymphadenopathy as well as anaemia due to increased plasma volume. Occasionally, platelet dysfunction or coagulopathy may be observed due to paraproteinaemia [1]. Another specific complication of the IgM paraprotein is blood hyperviscosity. Aside from increasing the risk of headaches and strokes [9], some of the most frequent vessels affected are those of the retina. Thus, a common consequence of hyperviscosity is visual changes due to retinal haemorrhages and engorged veins [1]. Furthermore, the paraprotein may induce an inflammatory response, and cause neuropathies [9].Management of symptomatic patients with WM generally includes Rituximab as monotherapy, or in combination with chemotherapy (e.g. bendamustine, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone, chlorambucil, or fludarabine) [3]. These therapies confer good 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 89% with Rituximab and Bendamustine and 81% with Bortezomib, Dexamethasone, Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide in a recent meta-analysis [10]; but chemotherapy is associated with side effects including gastrointestinal symptoms, cytopenias, risk of infections and neutropenic sepsis, and the longer-term risk of secondary cancers [11]. Also there is a limited number of lines of chemotherapy that can be used due to cumulative toxicity.More recently, BTK inhibitors (Ibrutinib, Zanubrutinib) have been licensed for WM and Zanubrutinib has been approved by NICE for treatment of patients with relapsed WM [2]. BTK inhibitors reduce the pro-survival downstream signalling from dysregulated MYD88 (L265P) homodimers [7] These targeted therapies have revolutionised WM treatment, with a high response rate and favourable safety profile [12].Here we present three patients with rare extranodal manifestations of WM, each with the MYD88 L265P mutation, and assess their response to the BTK inhibitor Zanubrutinib. The first of these three patients, Patient A, had a cutaneous relapse of WM. Cutaneous WM encompasses IgM bullous disease, IgM-storage papules, and neoplastic cell infiltrates [13]. There is limited literature about the use of Zanubrutinib to treat cutaneous presentations of WM.Patient B had orbital infiltration of WM, leading to periorbital swelling and diplopia. There are very few reports of this presentation in the literature; those reported are usually bilateral. Treatment for orbital infiltration is poorly defined, but has previously included solely chemotherapy, or a chemoradiotherapy combination [14].Patient C presented with a decline in mobility and cognition and was found to have nodular leptomeningeal infiltration. Bone marrow biopsy confirmed MYD88 L265P mutation and histology consistent with LPL. Patient C’s condition was deemed highly likely to be Bing Neel syndrome (BNS), a rare presentation, caused by central nervous system (CNS) involvement by LPL [15]. BNS is usually diagnosed by LPL findings on biopsy of cerebrum or meninges, which Patient C declined, or LPL cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [15].3 Case History and examination3.1 Patient APatient A was first diagnosed with WM in 2011 at the age of 76 years, having presented with night sweats, weight loss, generalised debility, lymphadenopathy and bone marrow failure. He had an IgM paraprotein of 17g/L and bone marrow trephine biopsy revealed a lymphoplasmacytoid infiltrate of >50%. He underwent four cycles of fludarabine-cyclophosphamide combination chemotherapy which he completed in January 2012. He subsequently relapsed and completed four cycles of Rituximab-Bendamustine chemotherapy in September 2014. Treatment was stopped at this point due to pancytopenia and he subsequently suffered with recurrent infections. He was commenced on immunoglobulin replacement therapy for panhypogammaglobulinaemia. He remained in remission from lymphoma until 2022, when he had an atypical, rare relapse.3.2 Patient B Patient B was diagnosed with LPL in December 2021, at the age of 69 years. She presented with exertional breathlessness and pancytopenia. She initially required blood transfusion, and bone marrow trephine biopsy demonstrated 60% infiltration with LPL. MYD88 L265P mutation was detected by PCR. She had a low-level IgM paraprotein of 11g/L. A staging CT scan revealed no lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly. Treatment with Rituximab monotherapy was commenced, and she completed four cycles. She had an excellent response to treatment with normalisation of the haemoglobin, a fall in the paraprotein to <2g/L, and she was able to resume her previous activities, including cycling. However, in November 2022, the LPL began to relapse with pancytopenia and a rise in the IgM paraprotein to 7g/L. A restaging CT scan revealed multiple enlarged abdominal and left pelvic lymph nodes. She was treated again with four cycles of Rituximab monotherapy and prednisolone, and once again responded well to treatment, until 2023 when, like patient A, she presented with a rare, but distinct relapse.3.3 Patient CPatient C, unlike patients A and B, had a rare, atypical presentation of LPL as his first presentation, rather than as a relapse. He was diagnosed with LPL in May 2023 at the age of 70 years, having presented with a gradual decline in mobility and cognition over 12-18 months.Investigations and treatment4.1 Patient AIn 2022, patient A developed an ulcer on his left ankle with associated cellulitis, which, when biopsied was in keeping with a low-grade lymphoma. On analysis, it was confirmed MYD88 L265P mutation was present, as with his original lymphoma, however there was no detectable paraprotein in his blood. He underwent a CT scan, which revealed multiple cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions on both sides of the diaphragm. Given widespread disease, radiotherapy was not a treatment option. As Ibrutinib had stopped being funded on the NHS for LPL, the decision was made to wait for Zanubrutinib to become available. Throughout the year he developed further skin lesions (Figure 1) that came and went, predominantly on his lower legs, and small, palpable groin nodes, though his blood counts remained stable, still with no detectable paraprotein. When reviewed again in August of 2023, the clinical picture was the same, with no palpable lymphadenopathy or hepatosplenomegaly. His blood counts were stable, but he still had firm nodular lesions, and the non-tender, indurated erythematous purple plaques that they would leave behind. These plaques were now also noted on his abdomen, left chest and left upper arm. Biopsy of these plaques confirmed that they were, as suspected, the LPL.When reviewed in clinic in January 2024, it was evident that the nodules on his lower legs were interfering with his daily activities. In particular, a recent lesion on his left medial ankle was open and weeping, having rubbed on footwear. He also exhibited an itchy rash on his chest, with pink macules of approximately 1cm. The decision was made to start treatment with Zanubrutinib, 320mg daily, along with an antihistamine.4.2 Patient BIn October 2023, patient B presented with bilateral proptosis (Figure 2) and binocular vertical diplopia. Examination in the ophthalmology clinic revealed right superior oblique weakness with secondary left inferior rectus under action. There was also bilateral restriction of abduction and elevation with a restriction of right adduction. An urgent MRI of the brain and orbits demonstrated soft tissue infiltration bilaterally in the superior intra-orbital regions with no evidence of brain involvement. Right orbital biopsy was performed and confirmed recurrent LPL. At this time her haemoglobin was normal and <2g/L IgM paraprotein was detectable. A restaging CT scan showed small volume enlarged lymph nodes in the right lower cervical and axillary regions and a mesenteric mass which had reduced in size compared with her previous imaging and measured 45 x 17mm. Zanubrutinib was commenced in December 2023, at a dose of 320mg daily.4.3 Patient CMRI head revealed unusual nodular leptomeningeal infiltration and an extra-parenchymal paranasal ethmoid mass. The diagnosis of LPL was confirmed on bone marrow examination and on biopsy of the ethmoid mass, with presence of MYD88 L265P mutation. He had a low-level IgM paraprotein of 4g/L. Although Patient C did not undergo a brain biopsy and no lymphoma cells were found in the CSF, it was felt highly likely that he had BNS, with leptomeningeal involvement with LPL. A baseline PET-CT scan identified scattered metabolically active lesions within the axial skeleton, but no lymphadenopathy or hepatosplenomegaly.Treatment options were discussed including high-dose methotrexate and intrathecal methotrexate versus Zanubrutinib, which can be accessed in specific circumstances for the first-line setting for LPL using private healthcare insurance. There have been reports of successful treatment of BNS using Zanubrutinib [16]. He chose to start treatment with Zanubrutinib.Outcome and follow-up5.1 Patient APatient A observed a reduction in the size of the cutaneous lesions after day 4 of Zanubrutinib, and the ulcerating lesion on his ankle had begun to heal. By day 12, when reviewed in clinic, the patient estimated that the skin lesions had halved in size and reported no side effects. When reviewed again 5 days later however, he reported marked fatigue, sleepiness, and anorexia, so was advised to halve the dose of Zanubrutinib to 160mg daily. His pruritis resolved, and on day 26 of treatment when reviewed again in clinic, he continued to exhibit a profound reduction in size of the lesions.After 8 weeks of treatment the cutaneous lesions had continued to regress, leaving behind only skin discoloration. The patient continued to experience fatigue as a side effect, having increased his dose to 160mg BD. He was therefore again prescribed half the dose for the next month. He continued taking Zanubrutinib, and after 7 months of treatment he continues on standard dose therapy, the skin lesions remain flat, his blood counts are stable and there is no detectable paraprotein.5.2 Patient BWhen seen for a 2-week follow-up, patient B’s eyes were less erythematous and swollen, but the diplopia remained. She had experienced no side effects of Zanubrutinib and was feeling well. At 4 weeks the diplopia was improved, and she was prescribed a further two cycles of Zanubrutinib 320mg once daily. At 96 days, the proptosis was improved but not completely resolved; Carmellose eye drops were used for symptom relief. At 3 months after starting Zanubrutinib, the diplopia had resolved, and her vision was 6/6 in both eyes.5.3 Patient CWithin the first month, Patient C experienced an improvement in his memory and in his mobility and balance. After 3 months of Zanubrutinib 320mg daily, he had an MRI head which showed that both the leptomeningeal disease and ethmoid mass were responding (Figure 3). The interim PET-CT scan showed reduction in fluorodeoxyglucose uptake at all skeletal sites in keeping with a complete metabolic remission. He continues treatment with Zanubrutinib and has an ongoing excellent response 16 months after starting Zanubrutinib. He has tolerated the treatment well and has a very mild sensory neuropathy affecting his feet, but reports no other side effects.DiscussionLymphoplasmacytic lymphoma is a rare haematological malignancy involving post-germinal centre B-cell lymphoproliferation. It typically presents with constitutional features, as well as cytopaenias due to bone marrow infiltration [1]. There has been good evidence for Zanubrutinib, a selective BTK inhibitor, in the treatment of LPL [17]. While there are documented cases of extranodal manifestations of the disease leading to tissue-specific symptoms, there is minimal reported evidence of the response of these cases to Zanubrutinib.There are few reported cases of cutaneous presentations of LPL. In 2020, a retrospective study [18] characterised the disease in nineteen patients with WM with cutaneous manifestations. Seven of these patients had cutaneous involvement associated with histological transformation to large B-cell lymphoma, but twelve of these patients had non-transformed WM. Amongst those without transformation, skin lesions preceded diagnosis in two cases, in four cases the lesions were concomitant with diagnosis, and six cases with WM preceded occurrence with median delay of 3.5 years. Non-transformed WM patients developed plaques (83%), nodules or tumours (42%) or papules (25%). A systematic review has been published looking at primary macroglobulinaemia-induced immunobullous dermatosis [19], however this article also included ‘IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance’ as well as WM patients.Cutaneous presentations of WM may be treated with BTK inhibitors, but again the literature on this is limited. Ibrutinib is a first class BTK inhibitor, efficacious in treating WM. One case report demonstrated a good response, sustained at 18 months [20], but with severe toxicities that led to the choice of the more selective, next generation Zanubrutinib in its place [17]. In a two-person case series of the use of Zanubrutinib for cutaneous LPL, one patient experienced near complete remission, while the other relapsed and sadly died, and as such, the authors hypothesised that the cutaneous lesions progress with the development of the underlying disease regardless of treatment [13]. We present Patient A as a case of cutaneous LPL trialled on Zanubrutinib, showing excellent response, exhibiting evidence for the use of Zanubrutinib in similar future cases. This patient observed rapid reduction in tumour size within from the first few days of treatment. Patient A reported fatigue, a well-documented side effect of Zanubrutinib [21] which was managed successfully with dose reduction.Orbital involvement with low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma is very commonly due to marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) [22]. There are a limited number of published cases detailing orbital involvement of LPL or WM. A systematic review [14] detailed 18 cases including their own, dating back to 1967. They explored different ocular manifestations, including unilateral and bilateral orbital masses, infiltration of rectus muscle and lacrimal gland involvement. Another case [23] details a patient with orbital mass and extra-ocular muscle involvement, who went on to be treated with ibrutinib monotherapy, followed by rituximab, bortezomib (a proteasome inhibitor) and dexamethasone following disease relapse. This patient remained stable for over 3 years before orbital swelling recurred. Patient B presented with a history of WM, diplopia and proptosis. MRI revealed intraorbital soft tissue infiltration with effect on extra-orbital muscle action, and she was trialled on Zanubrutinib. She showed marked improvement within the first month, and at 3 months her diplopia had resolved.Orbital involvement in WM has also been demonstrated in patients with BNS, [24,25] a rare manifestation of WM involving infiltration of LPL of the CNS causing neurological deficits [15]. One case report described treatment with Ibrutinib leading to resolution of bilateral optic nerve swelling. Other cases of orbital involvement of WM in association with BNS , differed in their treatment regimens (without the use of zanubrutinib), with some success [24, 25, 26]. This contrasts with other cases in which despite aggressive chemotherapeutic treatment, patients had only partial resolution or suffered severe vision loss or total blindness. [27, 28]While patient B did not display evidence of having BNS, Patient C did have a clinical picture and investigations consistent with BNS. The marked improvement in neurological and MRI signs following Zanubrutinib in this patient provides further evidence for this treatment for BNS. Elsewhere in the literature, in a case series of 44 WM patients, BNS developed at a median time of 4 years from diagnosis, although in 36% of these patients BNS was the first manifestation [29] of WM. Ibrutinib has been shown in a cohort study of 28 patients to lead to an 85% improvement or resolution of BNS symptoms and 47% clearance of disease from CSF [30]. There has also been a report of Zanubrutinib as a monotherapy [16] following unsuccessful treatment of WM in a 75-year-old female with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisolone. She re-presented with difficulty walking, and subsequent investigation revealed contrast enhancing lesions on MRI and CSF showing an increased total protein and lambda light chain restricted monoclonal B cells. She was diagnosed with BNS and received 12 cycles of high dose intravenous methotrexate. Unfortunately, the neurological dysfunction worsened, and she was trialled on 160mg BD Zanubrutinib which led to marked neurological improvement and maintained IgM paraprotein below 2g/L at 15 months.In conclusion, we present here three cases of a rare malignancy, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, with extranodal manifestations that are rarer still, namely: cutaneous, optic and leptomeningeal. Not only do we provide case studies of reference for these unusual presentations, but also provide insight into the ability of the next-generation BTK inhibitor, Zanubrutinib, to rapidly and successfully treat them. Two of these patients were treated in relapse, one as first line, but all exhibited rapid and complete improvement (though will continue to be monitored long-term). Moreover, in contrast to chemotherapy, side effects were minimal if any, including fatigue and mild peripheral neuropathy. These results are encouraging, and we recommend that further studies with larger patient cohorts should be conducted on the therapeutic benefit of Zanubrutinib, particularly in relapsed, atypical cases of LPL.References[1] A.V. Hoff brand, P.A.H. Moss. Essential Haematology – 6th ed. ISBN 978-1-4051-9890-5[2] Final scope for the appraisal of zanubrutinib for treating Waldenström’s macroglobulinaemia Issue Date: October 2020. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2020.[3] Pratt, G. et al (2022) Diagnosis and management of Waldenström macroglobulinaemia-A British Society for Haematology guideline. British Journal of Haematology. DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18036[4] McMaster, M. (2023) The epidemiology of Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Seminars in Hematology. 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2023.03.008[5] Varettoni, M. et al. (2019) Waldenström Macroglobulinemia in Young Patients Treated in the Modern Era: A Multi-Institutional Italian Study. Blood. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25961.[6] Kastritis E. et al. (2015) Competing risk survival analysis in patients with symptomatic Waldenström macroglobulinemia: the impact of disease unrelated mortality and of rituximab-based primary therapy. Haematologica. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2015.124149[7] Varettoni, M. et al. (2013) Prevalence and clinical significance of the MYD88 (L265P) somatic mutation in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia and related lymphoid neoplasms. Blood. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-457101[8] Treon, S. et al. (2020) Genomic Landscape of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia and Its Impact on Treatment Strategies. Journal of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.02314[9] Owen, R. et al. (2014) Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Waldenström macroglobulinaemia. British Journal of Haematology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.02314[10] Chane, W. et al (2023) Efficacy and safety of front-line treatment regimens for Waldenstrom macroglobulinaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Cancer Journal. DOI: 10.1038/s41408-023-00916-5[11] Paludo, J. et al (2018) Bendamustine and rituximab (BR) versus dexamethasone, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide (DRC) in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Annals of Hematology. DOI: 10.1007/s00277-018-3311-z[12] Sarosiek, S. et al. (2024) Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: Targeted Agents Taking Center Stage. Drugs. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-023-01974-6[13] Appenzeller, P. et al. (1999) Cutaneous Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia in transformation. American Journal of Dermatopathology. DOI: 10.1097/00000372-199904000-00007[14] Paggi, R. et al. (2023) Orbital Infiltration in a Patient with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: Need for Multidisciplinary Approach and Comparison with the Literature. Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases. DOI: 10.4084/MJHID.2023.028[15] Castillo JJ. et al. (2019) How we manage Bing-Neel syndrome. British Journal of Haematology. DOI: 10.1111/bjh.16167[16] Wong, J. et al. (2018) Efficacy of Zanubrutinib in the Treatment of Bing-Neel Syndrome. Hemasphere. DOI: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000155[17] Deshpande, A. et al. (2022) Zanubrutinib in Treating Waldenström Macroglobulinemia, the Last Shall Be the First. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S338655[18] Stien, S. et al. (2020) Cutaneous Involvement in Waldenström’s Macroglobulinaemia. Acta Derma Venereologica. DOI: 10.2340/00015555-3535[19] Armolo IF. Et al. (2023) Primary macroglobulinemia-induced immunobullous dermatosis: A systematic review. International Journal of Dermatology. DOI: 10.1111/ijd.16546[20] Lindhold, KE. (2021) Ibrutinib response in cutaneous transformed lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. EJHaem. DOI: 10.1002/jha2.253[21] Zanubrutinib (Brukinsa): CADTH Reimbursement Review: Therapeutic area: Waldenström macroglobulinemia (2022) Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.[22] Olsen, TG. Et al. (2019) Orbital lymphoma. Survey of Ophthalmology. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.08.002[23] Guerin, C. et al. (2022) Orbital involvement in Waldenstrom macroglobulinaemia: a multidisciplinary approach. Irish Journal of Medical Science. DOI: 10.1007/s11845-021-02846-2[24] Gavriatopoulou, M. et al. (2019) Treatment of Bing–Neel syndrome with first line sequential chemoimmunotherapy. Medicine. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017794[25] Stacy, RC. Et al. Orbital Involvement in Bing-Neel Syndrome. Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology. DOI: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e3181dee96c[26] Hughes, MS. Et al. (2014) Isolated Optic Nerve, Chiasm, and Tract Involvement in Bing–Neel Syndrome. Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology. 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000138[27] Doshi, RR. Et al. (2011) Orbital involvement in Bing-Neel syndrome. Journal of Nueo-Ophthalmology. DOI: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e31820ecbc1[28] Cuenca Hernandez, R. et al. (2015) Bing-Neel syndrome as an initial sign of Waldenström macroglobulinaemia associated with orbital infiltration. DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2013.04.007[29] Simon, L. et al (2015) Bing-Neel syndrome, a rare complication of Waldenström macroglobulinemia: analysis of 44 cases and review of the literature. Haematologica. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2015.13374[30] Castillo, JJ. et al. (2019) Ibrutinib for the treatment of Bing-Neel syndrome: a multicenter study. Blood. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-10-879593FiguresFigure 1