This scoping review explores the concept of proportionality at the intersection of law, public policy, and crisis management during the COVID-19 pandemic. The review identifies five central themes in the literature, focusing on proportionality as a regulatory tool in public sector crisis management. The pandemic necessitated global implementation of coercive measures to control virus spread, leading to significant infringements on human rights and raising critical questions about the permissible extent of administrative interventions. The aim is twofold: first, to address the controversial issue of decision-making under uncertainty by suggesting the application of the proportionality framework; second, to map key concepts, methods, and fields of study to identify research gaps related to proportionality in public health crisis decision-making. The findings emphasize the potential benefits of proportionality in structured crisis policy-making processes, aiding transparent decision-making and balancing rights and policy needs. This analysis provides valuable insights for policymakers, legal professionals, and public health authorities in navigating future crises.