Stephanie Easton

and 11 more

Background Many adolescents with asthma have dysfunctional breathing and poor quality of life. Breathing retraining is recommended for symptom management and breathing efficiency. This trial evaluated the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a digital breathing retraining intervention for adolescents with asthma (Breathe4T – a mobile-friendly website). Specifically, recruitment, follow-up response rates, acceptability and uptake of the intervention and measures, as well as agreement between two quality of life questionnaires were measured. Methods Adolescents (12-17 years) with asthma and impaired quality of life were recruited via UK primary and secondary care clinics and randomised into two, unblinded groups. The intervention group accessed Breathe4T for 6 months whilst the control group gained access after 6 months. Measures included quality of life (paediatric asthma quality of life questionnaire and paediatric quality of life short form), asthma control (asthma control test), healthcare utilisation and demographics at baseline, 2 and 6 months. Website data and interviews explored experiences of the intervention. Results 64 adolescents were randomised. At 2 months 30.2% of participants returned data, however telephone calls improved the rate to 70.3% at 6-month follow-up Breathing retraining was acceptable to adolescents and was perceived to have various benefits. Conclusions The study demonstrates acceptability and feasibility of a future definitive trial to evaluate effectiveness and impacts of a breathing retraining website on quality of life. Implications for recruitment and maximising follow up rates were identified. These learnings are likely to be applicable to other adolescent studies.

Olivia Harrison

and 11 more

Anxiety is one of the most common and debilitating mental health disorders, and is related to changes in interoception (perception of bodily states). While anxiety is more prevalent in women than men, gender differences in interoception-anxiety associations are often overlooked. Here we examined gender-specific relationships between anxiety and interoception in the breathing domain, utilising multicentre data pooled from four study sites (N=175; 51% female). State anxiety scores were quantified via the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and interoceptive measurements via an inspiratory load detection task. From this task, breathing-related interoceptive dimensions of sensitivity, decision bias, metacognitive bias (confidence in interoceptive decisions), and metacognitive insight (congruency between performance and confidence) were quantified. Regression analyses revealed a significant negative relationship between state anxiety and metacognitive bias (=-0.28; p=0.01) and insight (=-0.09; 95% Highest Density Interval [HDI] in a hierarchical Bayesian regression=[-0.18,-0.004]) across the whole sample, while anxiety did not relate to interoceptive sensitivity nor decision bias. No mean effects of gender were observed for any interoceptive variables, however, the relationship between anxiety and metacognitive insight into breathing perception was driven by women (women: =-0.18; HDI=[-0.31,-0.05]; men: =0.02; HDI=[-0.12,0.15]) with a significant interaction effect ( difference=-0.20; HDI=[-0.37, -0.01]). In summary, anxiety was associated with decreased metacognitive bias across all participants, while decreased interoceptive insight was only associated with anxiety in women but not men. Therefore, treatment programs focusing on interoceptive metacognitive bias may be useful for all anxiety patients, while interoceptive insight might represent a specific treatment target for women with anxiety.