We combine wavelet analysis and data fusion to investigate geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) on the Mäntsälä pipeline and the associated horizontal geomagnetic field, BH, variations during the late main phase of the 17 March 2013 geomagnetic storm. The wavelet analysis decomposes the GIC and BH signals at increasing ‘scales’ to show distinct multi-minute spectral features around the GIC spikes. Four GIC spikes > 10 A occurred while the pipeline was in the dusk sector – the first sine-wave-like spike at ~16 UT was ‘compound.’ It was followed by three ‘self-similar’ spikes two hours later. The contemporaneous multi-resolution observations from ground-(magnetometer, SuperMAG, SuperDARN), and space-based (AMPERE, TWINS) platforms capture multi-scale activity to reveal two magnetospheric modes causing the spikes. The GIC at ~16 UT occurred in two parts with the negative spike associated with a transient sub-auroral eastward electrojet that closed a developing partial ring current (PRC) loop, whereas the positive spike developed with the arrival of the associated mesoscale flow-channel in the auroral zone. The three spikes between 18-19 UT were due to bursty bulk flows (BBFs). We attribute all spikes to flow-channel injections (substorms) of varying scales. We use previously published MHD simulations of the event to substantiate our conclusions, given the dearth of timely in-situ satellite observations. Our results show that multi-scale magnetosphere-ionosphere activity that drives GICs can be understood using multi-resolution analysis. This new framework of combining wavelet analysis with multi-platform observations opens a research avenue for GIC investigations and other space weather impacts.

We investigate the causes of large $dB/dt$ events observed by SuperMAG, by comparing with the time-series of different types of geomagnetic activity, or “convection state”, for the duration of 2010. Spikes are found to occur predominantly in the pre-midnight and dawn sectors. We find that pre-midnight spikes are associated with substorm onsets. Dawn sector spikes are not directly associated with substorms, but with auroral activity occurring within the westward electrojet region. Azimuthally-spaced auroral features drift sunwards, producing Ps6 (10-20 min period) magnetic perturbations on the ground. The magnitude of $dB/dt$ is determined by the flow speed in the convection return flow region, which in turn is related to the strength of solar wind-magnetospheric coupling. Pre-midnight and dawn sector spikes can occur at the same time, as strong coupling favours both substorms and westward electrojet activity; however, the mechanisms that create them seem somewhat independent. The dawn auroral features share some characteristics with omega bands, but can also appear as north-south aligned auroral streamers. We suggest that these two phenomena share a single underlying cause.

High-latitude ionospheric convection is a useful diagnostic of solar wind-magnetosphere interactions and nightside activity in the magnetotail. For decades, the high-latitude convection pattern has been mapped using the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN), a distribution of ground-based radars which are capable of measuring line-of-sight (l-o-s) ionospheric flows. From the l-o-s measurements an estimate of the global convection can be obtained. As the SuperDARN coverage is not truly global, it is necessary to constrain the maps when the map fitting is performed. The lower latitude boundary of the convection, known as the Heppner-Maynard boundary (HMB), provides one such constraint. In the standard SuperDARN fitting, the HMB location is determined directly from the data, but data gaps can make this challenging. In this study we evaluate if the HMB placement can be improved using data from the Active Magnetosphere and Planetary Electrodynamics Response Experiment (AMPERE), in particular for active time periods when the HMB moves to latitudes below 55°. We find that the boundary as defined by SuperDARN and AMPERE are not always co-located. SuperDARN performs better when the AMPERE currents are very weak (e.g. during non-active times) and AMPERE can provide a boundary when there is no SuperDARN scatter. Using three geomagnetic storm events, we show that there is agreement between the SuperDARN and AMPERE boundaries but the SuperDARN-derived convection boundary mostly lies ~3° equatorward of the AMPERE-derived boundary. We find that disagreements primarily arise due to geometrical factors and a time lag in expansions and contractions of the patterns.