Introduction Remote healthcare has demonstrated benefits in providing high quality care, improving patient access, and reducing morbidity. In ear, nose, and throat surgery, there has been a recent surge in remote care driven by advancements including endoscopic otoscopy and boothless audiometry, as well as the coronavirus pandemic, but uncertainty exists regarding the minimum data needed for accurate remote diagnosis. Methods A panel of otology, audiology, general practice, and audiovestibular physicians were invited, and a literature review was undertaken to populate candidate dataset items for Round 1 of the Delphi process using the web-based software, Welphi. This was followed by two further Rounds, with controlled anonymised item-rating and qualitative feedback between rounds. Finally, a consensus meeting analysed and organised the results for dissemination of the final consensus outcomes. Results 70 studies were used to populate the questionnaire in Round 1. 34 multi-disciplinary expert panellists determined the final data items across the 3 Delphi Rounds. Experts worked at over 16 different centres across the UK. There was an average response rate of 94% across all rounds. Discussion This study highlights a multidisciplinary team’s consensus essential dataset for effective remote ear assessment. With NHS waiting lists at an all-time high, remote assessment capacity could alleviate strain and enhance patient care. This initiative will facilitate novel service and pathway redesign with the aim of ensuring all patients have access to high-quality ear assessments, regardless of location. We are also hopeful that this standardised dataset will also facilitate research and audit of remote ear services.

Introduction Effective medical staffing is pivotal for a successful healthcare system, demanding strategic planning to ensure a high-quality service. Although the UK’s doctor to population ratio has improved over time, it remains below global averages. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated existing challenges, resulting in an unprecedented NHS waiting list with Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) surgeries ranking third highest in waiting times amongst all specialties. Methods This study utilized a national jotform survey to gather data from ENTUK members, primarily focusing on consultant staffing within ENT departments across the UK. Additional information collected encompassed registration status, part-time roles, gender, vacancies, locum roles, associate specialists, registrars and other junior doctors, and advanced nurse practitioners. When survey responses were inadequate, direct communication was established with departmental consultants or secretaries, followed by Freedom of Information requests as necessary. All data were compiled using Microsoft Excel. Results Among the 65 responses to the ENTUK survey, 53 individual trusts were identified. These included 41 English acute trusts, with supplementary participation from Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Data from 749 consultants across 115 English acute trusts were collected in combination with a Freedom of Information request. Conclusion Despite an increased number of ENT consultants, the persistence of unfilled posts coincides with mounting waiting lists. The pandemic’s effects, including early retirements and part-time roles, emphasise the urgency of expanding training positions to counterbalance these shifts. Local and national interventions are essential to fortify and diversify the ENT workforce through a variety of strategies.