The Impact of NDIS pricing on Ballarat Disability Providers - AliceJane WebbWe need to firstly understand the policy making environment in order to influence the NDIS/NDA funding knowing who has the power to make decisions and changes is key, develop a well-defined understanding of the issues in order to create a clear unified solution and then advocate and lobby for new NDIS prices and a new Multi Enterprise Agreement. Gaining the attention of policymakers is complex, being able to simplicity present the problem and solution can ease any confusion around the issues raised (Cullerton et al., 2016).We need a proficient and successful NDIS market for disability support services that include:Quality frameworks for servicesFinancially viable for all three stakeholder groupsTraining and development for service provider employeesFair and effective enterprise agreement for service provider employeesTransparent pricing and calculationsEducation/advocacy for clients with a disabilityOur advocacy project will try to achieve these six key areas through a communication strategy that involves social media, talking with politicians, writing journal articles, talking at conferences and supporting other service providers and advocacy groups to join in.Look at his through the stages of the critical reflection model- deconstruct, confront, theorise, and think otherwise (Ramachandran, 2017), each stage of the model has an intention.The four stages look at a critical evaluation of the issue and advocacy strategy. The first two stages look at the meanings and discourses in applying the solution (Henderson & Noble, 2015). The final two staged assist in reconstructing through thinking about other evidence and possibilities on similar and differing topics (Thomas, 1999).The four stages assist in critically rethinking and reflecting academically whilst working through the possible issues and concerns with the implementation (Gur-Ze’ev, Masschelein & Blake, 2001).To deconstruct the issues and practices including problems of practice within this stage we try to understand the various perspectives that exist (Bartesaghi et al., 2018). This requires pulling apart analysis of what has or might happen in practice, especially practice that is taken for granted or have become normalised. Prior to the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), the disability sector had a different structure with three main groups of stakeholders, the customer who pays the bills (government agencies such as the Department of Health and Human Services), consumers who require the services, people with a disability (PWD) and the service providers who design and provide services for the consumers. The NDIS saw changes in many areas, mainly in the government role from the customer who paid the bills for the consumers, to the regulator and policy maker causing several perspective changes (DSS, 2012 & NDIA, 2019). The following table outlines the stakeholders as they are presently and their relevant perspectives and goals.The government perspective of the NDIS is focused on the best possible services for PWD with the least expense and maintaining that Australia wide (DHHS, 2016, & NDIA, 2018). The client perspectives include a service that supports their individual needs, quality of life improvement and freedom to choose and make informed decisions (NDIA, 2019 & DHHS, 2016). Service providers want to look after their employees through training, development, ethical and safe working conditions, to stay financially viable and provide the best possible cost-effective services to PWD (Foster, 2019 & Hubbard, 2019 & Jaworski et al., 2018). With three differing perspectives and goals it is difficult to come together and design the best and most sustainable disability sector.The confronting stage looks at the three perspectives (Government, Provider and Client) and confronts the assumptions underlining practice including an examination of the historical, social and cultural contexts involved (Loja et al., 2013).
IntroductionBipolar disorder is a chronic and severe mental health condition characterized by recurring episodes of mania and depression. It affects approximately 1-2% of the global population, and its impact extends beyond the individual diagnosed to significantly influence their close relationships and family dynamics (American Psychiatric Association, 2013; Merikangas et al., 2011). The unpredictable and intense mood swings associated with bipolar disorder can challenge the emotional stability and communication patterns within relationships, leading to distress and disruptions in family life.1.1 Understanding Bipolar Disorder and its ManifestationsBipolar disorder encompasses two main mood episodes: the manic phase, characterized by elevated and expansive moods, excessive energy, and impulsive behaviors, and the depressive phase, marked by feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest in activities (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). These mood shifts can be distressing and confusing for both the individual with bipolar disorder and their loved ones.1.2 The Impact of Bipolar Disorder on RelationshipsThe fluctuating nature of bipolar disorder poses unique challenges to relationships. During manic episodes, individuals may engage in risky behaviors, experience heightened irritability, and have difficulty focusing on others’ needs (Yatham et al., 2018). In contrast, depressive episodes can lead to withdrawal, emotional numbing, and reduced engagement with partners and family members (Miklowitz & Johnson, 2009). The interplay between these mood swings and relationship dynamics can result in conflicts, emotional distancing, and strained communication patterns.1.3 Effect on Family DynamicsBipolar disorder’s impact extends to the entire family unit, affecting not only intimate partners but also children, parents, and siblings. Family members may experience feelings of helplessness, confusion, and frustration as they attempt to support their loved one while navigating the challenges posed by the disorder (Magaña et al., 2015). The increased stress within the family system can lead to changes in roles, communication breakdowns, and potential disruptions in daily routines.1.4 Importance of Addressing the Impact on Relationships and FamilyRecognizing and understanding the impact of bipolar disorder on relationships and family dynamics is essential for providing comprehensive care and support. By addressing these challenges, mental health professionals can tailor interventions to promote healthier coping strategies and enhance relationship resilience. Furthermore, fostering open communication and providing support systems can help partners and family members manage the emotional toll of supporting a loved one with bipolar disorder.In conclusion, bipolar disorder significantly influences relationships and family life, affecting emotional dynamics, communication patterns, and family functioning. By understanding the manifestations of bipolar disorder within relationships, mental health professionals can develop targeted interventions to alleviate distress and promote healthy coping strategies for both individuals with bipolar disorder and their families.
IntroductionArt therapy is an innovative and versatile form of psychotherapy that utilizes the creative process of art-making as a therapeutic tool to address emotional, psychological, and social challenges. This approach acknowledges the inherent connection between art and human expression, dating back to ancient times when art was used for healing and self-discovery (Malchiodi, 2012). Over the years, art therapy has evolved into a distinct therapeutic practice, combining elements of psychology, art, and counseling to empower individuals to explore their inner world through artistic expression.The use of art in healing dates back to ancient civilizations, such as the Greeks, Egyptians, and Native Americans, who recognized the therapeutic potential of creative expression (Carr, 2004). However, it was not until the 20th century that art therapy emerged as a formal discipline, with pioneers like Margaret Naumburg and Edith Kramer paving the way for its integration into the field of psychology (Rubin, 2016).Art therapy is grounded in various theoretical frameworks, including psychodynamic, humanistic, and cognitive-behavioral approaches (Malchiodi, 2012). These theories provide the foundation for understanding the underlying mechanisms through which art-making can promote emotional healing and self-awareness. The integration of these diverse theoretical perspectives makes art therapy a flexible and adaptable modality, capable of addressing a wide range of mental health issues and population groups.In recent years, the efficacy of art therapy has been supported by a growing body of research that examines its therapeutic outcomes and mechanisms. Studies have demonstrated its positive impact on reducing anxiety, depression, and stress while enhancing overall well-being and quality of life (Kaimal et al., 2017; Luzzatto, 2021). Additionally, neuroscientific research has shed light on the brain mechanisms activated during art-making, offering insights into how creativity influences emotional regulation and cognitive processes (Schore, 2019).Despite these advances, some aspects of art therapy’s efficacy and underlying mechanisms remain underexplored. This article aims to bridge this gap by exploring the multifaceted nature of art therapy and the mechanisms through which it facilitates therapeutic change. By delving into historical foundations, theoretical perspectives, and emerging research findings, this article seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of the therapeutic power of art and its significance in contemporary mental health practice.
IntroductionAnxiety and sleep disturbances are prevalent and interconnected issues that significantly impact individuals’ mental health and overall well-being. Anxiety disorders, characterized by excessive worry, fear, and heightened arousal, affect approximately 284 million people worldwide (World Health Organization, 2017). Concurrently, sleep problems are a global concern, affecting nearly one-third of the adult population (Ohayon, 2012). Mounting evidence suggests a bidirectional relationship between anxiety and sleep, wherein anxiety can disrupt sleep patterns, and poor sleep can exacerbate anxiety symptoms.The interplay between anxiety and sleep is not merely coincidental; instead, it stems from shared neurobiological mechanisms. The amygdala, a key brain structure involved in processing emotions and threat perception, plays a pivotal role in both anxiety and sleep regulation (McEwen et al., 2015). Additionally, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, responsible for the stress response, influences both anxiety and sleep-wake cycles (Sapolsky, 2003).On one hand, anxiety can disrupt sleep through various mechanisms. Individuals with anxiety often experience heightened cognitive and physiological arousal, leading to difficulties falling and staying asleep (Riemann et al., 2010). Sleep disturbances in anxiety can manifest as insomnia, characterized by difficulties initiating or maintaining sleep, and frequent nocturnal awakenings (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Furthermore, anxiety-related nightmares can disrupt sleep continuity and contribute to sleep-related distress (Levin & Fireman, 2002).On the other hand, sleep disturbances can fuel anxiety symptoms. Sleep deprivation can lead to heightened emotional reactivity and impaired cognitive functions, amplifying anxiety-related thoughts and emotions (Yoo et al., 2007). Sleep fragmentation, characterized by frequent awakenings during the night, can impair emotional regulation processes, making it challenging for individuals to manage anxiety (Choi et al., 2008). Moreover, sleep disturbances can contribute to cognitive biases, such as negative attentional biases, further exacerbating anxiety-related cognitions (Bradley et al., 1997).Understanding the bidirectional relationship between anxiety and sleep is crucial, as it has significant implications for clinical practice and public health. Identifying the underlying neurobiological mechanisms and risk factors associated with this relationship can inform targeted interventions for individuals experiencing anxiety-related sleep disturbances. Moreover, addressing both anxiety and sleep disturbances concurrently may lead to more effective treatment outcomes and improved quality of life for affected individuals.The current article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the bidirectional relationship between anxiety and sleep. It explores the neurobiological mechanisms linking anxiety and sleep, examines the impact of anxiety on sleep and vice versa, and identifies vulnerable populations at higher risk for experiencing this bidirectional relationship. Additionally, the article discusses evidence-based strategies for improving sleep in individuals with anxiety and emphasizes the importance of integrating sleep interventions within anxiety treatment protocols. By shedding light on this complex relationship, this article seeks to contribute to the development of targeted interventions that promote improved mental health and sleep quality in individuals struggling with anxiety-related sleep disturbances.