Estimation of the ionospheric conductance is a crucial step in coupling the magnetosphere & ionosphere (MI). Since the high-latitude ionosphere closes magnetospheric currents, conductance in this region is pivotal to examine & predict MI coupling dynamics, especially during extreme events. In spite of its importance, only recently have impacts of key magnetospheric & ionospheric contributors affecting auroral conductance (e.g., particle distribution, ring current, anomalous heating, etc.) been explored using global models. Addressing these uncertainties require new capabilities in global magnetosphere - ionosphere - thermosphere models, in order to self-consistently obtain the multi-scale, dynamic sources of conductance. This work presents the new MAGNetosphere - Ionosphere - Thermosphere (MAGNIT) auroral conductance model, which delivers the requisite capabilities to fully explore the sources of conductance & their impacts. MAGNIT has been integrated into the Space Weather Modeling Framework to couple dynamically with the BATSRUS magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model, the Rice Convection Model (RCM) of the ring current, the Ridley Ionosphere Model (RIM) & the Global Ionosphere Thermosphere Model (GITM). This new model is used to address the precise impact of diverse conductance contributors during geomagnetic events. First, the coupled MHD-RIM-MAGNIT model is used to establish diffuse & discrete precipitation using kinetic theory. The key innovation is to include the capability of using distinct particle distribution functions (PDF) in a global model: in this study, we explore precipitation fluxes estimated using isotropic Maxwellian & Kappa PDFs. RCM is then included to investigate the effect of the ring current. Precipitating flux computed on closed field lines by RCM is compared against MAGNIT results, to show that expected results are alike. Lastly, GITM is coupled to study the impact of the ionosphere thermosphere system. Using the MAGNIT model, aforementioned conductance sources are progressively applied in idealized simulations & compared against the OVATION Prime Model. Finally, data-model comparisons against SSUSI, AMPERE & SuperMAG measurements during the March 17, 2013 Storm are shown. Results show remarkable progress of conductance modeling & MI coupling layouts in global models.

We present latest results from the Conductance Model for Extreme Events (CMEE) and the Magnetosphere-Ionosphere-Thermosphere (MAGNIT) Conductance Model. Both models have been integrated into the Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF) to couple dynamically with the BATS-R-US MHD model, the Rice Convection Model (RCM) of the ring current & the Ridley Ionosphere Model (RIM) to simulate the April 2010 “Galaxy15” Event. The model is used with three grid configurations: the low-resolution configuration currently employed by NOAA’s Space Weather Prediction Center and two additional configurations that decrease the minimum grid resolution from ¼ RE to ⅛ and 1/16 RE. In addition, the simulation is driven with and without the dynamic coupling with RCM to study the impact of the ring current’s pressure correction in the inner magnetospheric domain. Using this model setup for a Maxwellian distribution, aforementioned precipitation sources are progressively applied and compared against the DMSP SSUSI observations. Finally, data-model comparisons against AMPERE Field-Aligned Currents, geomagnetic indices & magnetometer measurements are shown, with additional comparison against the existing conductance model in RIM. Results show remarkable progress in auroral precipitation modeling & MI coupling layouts in global models.

We present an analysis of in-situ thermal ion measurements from a cusp auroral sounding rocket. Using a forward modeling procedure, we find most-probable thermal ion temperature and parallel (field-aligned) bulk flow velocity along the trajectory. Spatially and temporally intermittent fine-scale structure in upflowing/downflowing features in the dayside cusp ionosphere are presented. We show that the observed ion temperatures are consistent with Joule heating expectations if spatially and temporally intermittent drivers and responses in the dynamic cusp environment are considered. Additionally, a forward modeling procedure for the ion data interpretation is improved and a sensitivity analysis is presented.