Gaoqi Xu

and 7 more

Aims Anlotinib is a novel oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets VEGFR-2, VEGFR -3, FGFR1-4, PDGFR-α, PDGFR-β, c-Kit, and Ret. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of anlotinib in patients with malignant tumors and identify various covariates that might affect its pharmacokinetic parameters. Methods 407 plasma concentrations from 16 patients were analyzed to establish a population pharmacokinetic model using the nonlinear mixed-effects model method. All patients were administered anlotinib (12 mg) orally, as a single drug therapy. The potential influence of demographic, hepatic, and renal function data was investigated using automated stepwise covariate model. The final model was evaluated using diagnostic goodness-of-fit plots, bootstrap, and visual predictive check methods. Results A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination adequately described anlotinib pharmacokinetics. The population estimates of apparent total plasma clearance (CL/F) was 9.26 L/h (29.20% IIV), apparent volume of distribution (V/F) was 2010 L (29.20 IIV), and absorption rate constant (Ka) was 0.64 h-1 (56.70% IIV). Total cholesterol (TC) was identified as a covariate affecting CL/F, while alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was found to be statistically significant for V/F. Conclusion The population pharmacokinetic model adequately described the pharmacokinetics of anlotinib in patients with malignant tumors. TC and ALP might have a slight effect on the pharmacokinetic profile of anlotinib.

Di-hong Yang

and 5 more

Meiling Zuo

and 8 more

Objective: To assess whether dose adjustments of linezolid were needed based on renal function and body weight against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Methods: Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) were conducted to simulate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model. Area under the concentration time curve (AUC)/ minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio and percentage of time above the MIC (%T>MIC) were regarded as PKPD targets. The probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fractions of response (CFR) were calculated to assess the efficacy. Regarding safety, trough plasma concentration (Cmin) > 8 mg/L was used to target for toxicity. Results: Using AUC /MIC > 100 as the parameter, the CFR of linezolid at the standard dose [600 mg every 12 h (q12h)] were 57.01%, 93.22% and 99.93% in patients with normal renal function, patients with renal dysfunction and low body weight patients with renal dysfunction, respectively. Using 100%T > MIC as the parameter, all the CFR of three population groups were more than 90% at the standard dose. The percentages of Cmin > 8 mg/L at the standard dose of linezolid were 24.16%, 53.24% and 90.10% in three population groups on day 7. Conclusions: The risk of thrombocytopenia of linezolid was extremely high in low body weight patients with renal impairment when receiving standard linezolid dose. 600 mg q12h might be effective and safe against MRSA infection in patients with normal renal function, while 450mg q12h and 300mg q12h in patients with renal dysfunction and low body weight patients with renal dysfunction, respectively.