Aabha Divya

and 10 more

Aim: Post-operative bleeding remains a significant risk after cardiac surgery. Despite adequate protamine reversal of heparin intraoperatively, protein-bound heparin causes anticoagulant effect, leading to bleeding in the post-operative period. The aim of this study is to whether the use of a four-hour, low dose protamine infusion in intensive care would reduce post-operative bleeding and hence, blood transfusion requirements. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of seven hundred and two patients, who underwent elective or urgent coronary artery bypass grafting from April 2014 and January 2017, were divided into two groups based on who received post-operative protamine infusion (Group A, 472 patients) versus those who did not (Group B, 230 patients). They were assessed for amount of post-operative mediastinal and pleural drainage for the first 24 hours, use of post-operative transfusion of blood products, postoperative hospital stay, and re-exploration. Results: We found no significant difference between the rate of bleeding in either of the groups. No significant difference was observed in blood product requirements as well. In the sub-group consisting of patients with high BMI (BMI ≥30), who received protamine infusion, post-operative platelets transfusion was found to be significantly less. Conclusions: Our results suggest that a low dose protamine infusion given in the immediate postoperative period does not lead to any significant clinical benefits. Both patients receiving and not receiving the infusion had similar postoperative drainage, transfusion requirements, haemorrhagic morbidity, mortality and length of hospital stay.

Mohamed Farag

and 11 more

Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequent after any cardiac surgery, but evidence suggests it may have no significant impact on survival if sinus rhythm (SR) is effectively restored early after the onset of the arrhythmia. In contrast, management of preoperative AF is often overlooked during or after cardiac surgery despite several proposed protocols. This study sought to evaluate the impact of preoperative AF on mortality in patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods We performed a retrospective, single-centre study involving 2,628 consecutive patients undergoing elective, primary isolated surgical AVR from 2008 to 2018. A total of 268/ 2,628 patients (10.1%) exhibited AF before surgery. The effect of preoperative AF on mortality was evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Short-term mortality was 0.8% and was not different between preoperative AF and SR cohorts. Preoperative AF was highly predictive of long-term mortality (median follow-up of 4 years [Q1-Q3 2-7]; HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.79-2.79, P<0.001), and remained strongly and independently predictive after adjustment for other risk factors (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.21-1.96, P<0.001) compared with preoperative SR. In propensity score-matched analysis, the adjusted mortality risk was higher in the AF cohort (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04-1.99, P=0.03) compared with the SR cohort. Conclusions Preoperative AF was independently predictive of long-term mortality in patients undergoing isolated surgical AVR. It remains to be seen whether concomitant surgery or other preoperative measures to correct AF may impact long-term survival.