Objective: To compare postoperative reproductive outcomes between salpingectomy and neosalpingostomy for bilateral severe hydrosalpinges. Design: Single center, prospective cohort study. Setting: A hospital affiliated to a medical college in China. Population: Women aged 20 to 45 years old, diagnosed with bilateral hydrosalpinges and scheduled for surgery were initial eligibility criteria. Women with previous tubal surgery or tubal pregnancy, no fertility intention, or no confirmation of severe bilateral hydrosalpinges during surgery were excluded. Methods: Bilateral salpingectomy or neosalpingostomy was performed based on a shared decision approach. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the cumulative livebirth rate. Secondary outcomes included time to first live birth, biochemical pregnancy, clinical miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, mode of conception, and gestational age at delivery. Results: A total of 113 women were involved in the analysis. When the result of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) in the neosalpingostomy group was incorporated, salpingectomy resulted in a higher cumulative livebirth rate (85.3% vs 76.0%, hazard ratio of the whole survival curve = 2.18, 95% CI 1.37 - 3.45), a lower risk of ectopic pregnancy (1.8% vs 20.7%, risk ratio = 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 - 0.57), and a shorter time to live birth than neosalpingostomy. 16/58 (27.6%) women in the neosalpingostomy group had a live birth via natural conception, compared to 0/55 (0.0%) in the salpingectomy group. Conclusions：Salpingectomy for bilateral severe hydrosalpinges resulted in a higher cumulative livebirth rate and a lower risk of ectopic pregnancy. However, neosalpingostomy can offer certain option for women to conceive naturally without IVF treatment.

Objective: To compare the effect of a hysteroscopic niche resection with a Levenorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) on postmenstrual spotting in women with a symptomatic niche in the uterine cesarean scar. Design: Single center, prospective cohort study. Setting: A hospital affiliated to a medical college in China. Population: Women diagnosed with a niche by MRI scan and postmenstrual spotting of at least two days. Method: Women were allocated to two groups based on the shared medical decision-making approach, and were followed up for 1 year after treatment. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was effectiveness in reducing postmenstrual spotting. Secondary outcomes were menstrual characteristics, direct medical costs, complications and side effects. Results: Effectiveness of LNG-IUD was significantly higher than a hysteroscopic niche resection during the first year, based on linear mixed models (P=0.009), and the effectiveness increased overtime within 1 year. Postmenstrual spotting reduced statistically in both groups. More slight side effects, although not statistically significant, were reported in LNG-LUD group at obviously lower direct medical costs. Conclusion：LNG-IUD is more effective in the treatment of postmenstrual spotting from the 6th month onwards than a hysteroscopic niche resection in women with a symptomatic niche at lower direct costs. Key Words：Niche, uterine cesarean scar, hysteroscopy niche resection, LNG-IUD, postmenstrual spotting, amenorrhea Tweetable abstract: LNG-IUD is more effective in the treatment of postmenstrual spotting related to a niche than hysteroscopic niche resection.