FIBRINOLYSIS PHENOTYPES DIFFER AMONGST CARDIAC SURGERY PATIENTS:
ANTIFIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY FOR ALL?
Abstract
The recognition of fibrinolysis phenotypes in trauma patients has led to
a reevaluation of antifibrinolytic therapy (AF). Many cardiac patients
also receive AF, however the distribution of fibrinolytic phenotypes in
that population is unknown. The purpose of this study was to fill that
gap. Methods: Data were retrospectively reviewed from 78 cardiac surgery
patients. Phenotypes were defined as hypofibrinolytic (LY30
<0.8%), physiologic (LY30 0.8-3.0%) and hyperfibrinolytic
(LY30 >3%). Continuous variables were expressed as M ± SD
or median (interquartile range). Results: The study population was 65±10
yrs old, 74% male, average body mass index of 29±5 kg/m2. Fibrinolytic
phenotypes were distributed as physiologic=45%, hypo=32% and hyper =
23%. There was no obvious effect of age, gender, race, or ethnicity on
the distribution of fibrinolysis phenotypes; 47% received AF. The time
with chest tube during post-operative recovery was longer in those who
received AF (4[3,5] days) vs no AF (3[2,4] days), P=0.037). All
cause morbidity occurred in 51% of patients who received AF vs 25%
with no AF (p=0.017). However, with AF vs no AF, apparent differences in
median chest tube output (1379 vs 820ml, p=0.075), hospital LOS (13 vs
10 days, P=0.873), estimated blood loss (1100 vs 775 ml, P=0.127), units
of transfused RBCs (4 vs 2], P=0.152) or all-cause mortality (5.4%
[2/37] vs 10% [4/41], P=0.518) were not statistically
significant. Conclusion: This is the first description of three
distinctly different fibrinolytic phenotypes in cardiac surgery
patients. In this population, the use of AF was associated with
increased morbidity.