Among-individual diet variation within a lake trout ecotype: lack of
stability of niche use.
- Louise Chavarie,
- Kimberly Howland,
- Les Harris,
- Colin Gallagher,
- Michael Hansen,
- William Tonn,
- Andrew Muir,
- Charles Krueger
Louise Chavarie
Michigan State University
Corresponding Author:chavarie@ualberta.ca
Author ProfileMichael Hansen
US Geological Survey Hammond Bay Biological Station
Author ProfileAbstract
In a polymorphic species, stable differences in resource use are
expected among ecotypes, and homogeneity in resource use is predicted
within an ecotype. Yet, using a broad resource spectrum has been
identified as a strategy for fishes living in unproductive northern
environments, where food is patchily distributed and ephemeral. We
investigated whether individual specialization of trophic resources
occurred within the generalist piscivore ecotype of lake trout from
Great Bear Lake, Canada, reflective of a form of diversity. Four
distinct dietary patterns of resource use within the lake trout ecotype
were detected from fatty acid composition, with some variation linked to
spatial patterns within Great Bear Lake. Feeding habits of different
groups within the ecotype were not associated with detectable
morphological or genetic differentiation, suggesting that behavioral
plasticity caused the trophic differences. A low level of genetic
differentiation was detected between exceptionally large-sized
individuals and other individuals. Investigating a geologically young
system that displays high levels of intraspecific diversity and focusing
on individual variation in diet suggested that individual trophic
specialization can occur within an ecotype. The characterization of
niche use among individuals, as done in this study, is necessary to
understand the role that individual variation can play at the beginning
of differentiation processes.29 Jul 2020Submitted to Ecology and Evolution 31 Jul 2020Submission Checks Completed
31 Jul 2020Assigned to Editor
04 Aug 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
30 Sep 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
05 Oct 2020Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
17 Nov 20201st Revision Received
18 Nov 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
18 Nov 2020Submission Checks Completed
18 Nov 2020Assigned to Editor
02 Dec 2020Editorial Decision: Accept