Gunter Sturm

and 38 more

Background: There is controversy whether taking β-blockers or ACE inhibitors (ACEI) is a risk factor for more severe systemic insect sting reactions (SSR) and whether it increases the number or severity of adverse events (AE) during venom immunotherapy (VIT). Methods: In this open, prospective, observational, multicenter trial, we recruited patients with a history of a SSR and indication for VIT. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether patients taking β-blockers or ACEI show more systemic AE during VIT compared to patients without such treatment. Results: In total, 1,425 patients were enrolled and VIT was performed in 1,342 patients. Of all patients included, 388 (27.2%) took antihypertensive (AHT) drugs (10.4% took β-blockers, 11.9% ACEI, 5.0% β-blockers and ACEI). Only 5.6% of patients under AHT treatment experienced systemic AE during VIT as compared with 7.4% of patients without these drugs (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.43–1.22, p=0.25). The severity of the initial sting reaction was not affected by the intake of β-blockers or ACEI (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.89–1.46, p=0.29). In total, 210 (17.7%) patients were re-stung during VIT and 191 (91.0%) tolerated the sting without systemic symptoms. Of the 19 patients with VIT treatment failure, 4 took β-blockers, none an ACEI. Conclusions: This trial provides robust evidence that taking β-blockers or ACEI does neither increase the frequency of systemic AE during VIT nor aggravate SSR. Moreover, results suggest that these drugs do not impair effectiveness of VIT. (Funded by Medical University of Graz, Austria; Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT04269629)

Berta Ruiz

and 7 more

Background. Although exposure to stings has been identified as the main risk factor for anaphylaxis due to Hymenoptera venom allergy, professional beekeepers receive hundreds of them yearly without developing systemic reactions. This study aims to analyse the immunological profile of people exposed to bee stings. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted. Participants were recruited and classified into three groups: allergic patients (AP) experiencing systemic reactions after bee stings, with a positive intradermal test and specific IgE (sIgE) to Apis mellifera venom (AmV); tolerant beekeepers (TBK) receiving ≥ 50 stings/year; and healthy non-exposed controls (HC). Serum levels of sIgE and specific IgG4 (sIgG4) to AmV, rApi m1, rApi m2, rApi m3, Api m4, rApi m5 and rApi m10, as well as AmV-induced basophil degranulation, percentage of T-cell subsets, Treg cells and IL-10 production were measured. Results. APs had high levels of sIgE to AmV and all allergic components (p<0.001) together with a high basophil activation rate (p<0.001) compared to TBKs. Conversely, compared to TBKs, APs showed lower levels of sIgG4 (p<0.001) and IL-10 (p<0.001) as well as a reduced CTLA-4+ Treg population (p=0.001), together with enhanced Helios+ Treg (p<0.004), Th1 (p=0.008), Th2 (p=0.004) and Th17 (p=0.007) populations. Conclusion. Two different profiles were identified: the allergic profile is well defined by parameters of IgE response, some of them also present in the tolerant beekeeper profile, which is strongly marked by Treg activity.