Fabio Marcolin

and 7 more

Non-native species are one of the greatest threats to biodiversity worldwide, due to their direct and indirect effects on native communities. There are two opposing hypotheses to explain how non-native species successfully establish outside their native range. The first posits that non-native species are closely related to local native species through environmental filtering which selects species with similar traits; the second, that non-native species are distantly related to native species in the area in which they establish due to limiting similarity which minimizes competition. We assessed support for these two hypotheses by characterising the functional trait space of bird communities in Italian cities. We surveyed 220 points in breeding and winter periods along an urbanisation gradient in six cities. We assessed the two opposing hypotheses by calculating functional diversity metrics (Functional Dispersion i.e. quantification of the distribution of functional elements in the niche space, and Contribution i.e. contribution of each species to the niche space) for each community. We then modelled these metrics in relation to the presence/absence of non-native parakeet species along the urbanisation gradient. We found that non-native parakeet species were more likely to establish in the vacant functional niche space of urban bird communities, showing marked dissimilarity to native species in terms of niche space. Our results suggest that limiting similarity is the main mechanism promoting invasions at the local scale. Urban environments offer novel opportunities that are exploited by non-native birds, minimising competition with native species. This insight into niche space processes in urban areas, which can act as centres for expansion of non-native birds into other environments, can be used when implementing management strategies to enhance environmental filtering in these areas, thus reducing the chances of further establishment of non-native species.

Xin Wang

and 6 more

General theory predicts that ecological specialization should be rare in marine ecosystems, given that barriers to dispersal are less effective in the vastness of the sea compared to terrestrial settings. This paradigm, however, hardly fits with classical theories of local adaptation, leaving the question open of as to how marine diversity could originate at a restricted spatial scale. We tackled this so-called “Marine Speciation Paradox” by investigating how local specialization could arise in a widely distributed marine species, the seaweed pipefish Syngnathus schlegeli. We integrated morphological, genomic, and niche-based evidences to unravel geographical structuring in S. schlegeli populations. We revealed the existence of a north-to-south phenotypic gradient in eye size among S. schlegeli populations. This morphological differentiation was paralleled by genetic divergence, with South China Sea populations emerging as relatively independent. The north-to-south phylogeographical structuring was further corroborated by ecological analyses. We observed high niche differentiation among northern, central, and southern populations, resulting from both niche expansion and niche shift processes. Projected habitat suitability onto the Last Glacial Maximum revealed the existence of historical barriers to dispersal between the South and East China seas. We showed that the effect of this historical segregation, in concert with niche-driven ecological differentiation, lead to establishment of three distinct clades across the widely distributed marine pipefish. Ultimately, our study demonstrates that even the sea environment maintains the potential for adaptive radiation and ecological specialization, suggesting that ‘marine speciation’ may actually be far from being ‘paradoxical’.