Background: There exist sex differences in the clinical profile, management, and outcome of atrial fibrillation (AF). Catheter ablation of AF has become a first-line therapy and has markedly made headway over recent decades. Little is known about sex differences and temporal trends in hospitalization for catheter ablation of AF in the real-world setting. Conclusions: Safety of catheter ablation for AF were comparable in both sexes. In contrast, the women showed a higher CHA2DS2-VA score compared with the men. The percentage of patients with CHA2DS2-VA score ≥2 increased more quickly in women than men. Further sex-specific research is warranted to reduce this sex disparity.

Abstract Introduction: Linear ablation in addition to pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) has failed to improve the success rate for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), due to incomplete block of ablation lines, especially in the mitral isthmus (MI). Methods and results: The study enrolled 191 patients (66 in group 1 and 125 in group 2). In group 1, EI-VOM was firstly performed, followed by radiofrequency (RF) applications targeting bilateral PVAI and bidirectional block in the roofline, cavotricuspid isthmus, and MI. In group 2, PVAI and the three linear ablations were completed using only RF energy. MI block was achieved in 63(95.5%) and 101(80.8%) patients in group 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.006). Patients in group 1 had shorter ablation time for left pulmonary vein antrum (8.15 min vs 12.59 min, p<0.001) and MI (7.0 min vs 11.8 min, p<0.001) and required less cardioversion (50(78.5%) vs 113(90.4%), p=0.007). During the 12-month follow-up, 58 (87.9%) patients were free from AF/AT in group 1 compared with 81 (64.8%) in group 2 (p<0.001). In multivariate cox regression, the ‘upgraded 2C3L’ procedure is associated with a lower recurrence rate (HR 0.27, 95%CI 0.12-0.59). Conclusion: Compared with the conventional ‘2C3L’ approach, the ‘upgraded 2C3L’ approach has higher effectiveness for ablation of PeAF.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in abdominal solid organ transplant recipients and a cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. However, the outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) in transplant recipients with AF remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the outcomes of CA in renal and hepatic transplant recipients. Methods and Results: Between 2015 and 2019, 14 transplant recipients (9 with kidney transplantation and 5 with liver transplantation) were enrolled from among 10,741 AF patients and underwent CA at Anzhen Hospital. Another 56 patients matched by age, sex and AF type were selected as the control group (4 controls for each transplant recipient). During a mean follow-up of 30.0±13.3 months after the initial procedure, 10 (71.4%) of the transplant patients, compared to 41 (73.2%) of the control patients, remained free from AF recurrence(P=1.000). A repeated procedure was performed in 1 transplant patient and in 6 control subjects. Consequently, 11 (78.6%) of the transplant patients, compared to 46 (82.1%) of controls, were in sinus rhythm after the repeated ablation (P=0.715). Notably, Kaplan–Meier analysis did not demonstrate any significant differences in the atrial arrhythmia-free rate after the initial and repeated procedure between the two groups. Vascular complications were identified in 1 transplant patient and 2 control subjects, while no life-threatening complications were observed in either group. There was no transient allograft dysfunction in transplant recipients after CA. Conclusion: CA is safe and effective in abdominal solid transplant recipients, and may be an optimal therapeutic strategy for this group.

Background There are distinct results for the relationship between new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) and subsequent incident cancer. To date, no systematic analysis has been conducted on this issue. This study aims to explore the relationship between NOAF and the risk of developing cancer through a meta-analysis with a large sample size. Methods Electronic databases, such as PubMed and EMBASE, were searched for published relevant studies on NOAF patients diagnosed with cancer after and during follow-ups, including reported records of baseline information and the statistical result of morbidity. Two investigators independently reviewed the articles and extracted the data using uniform standards and definitions. The meta-analysis was conducted using the Cochrane Program Review Manager. Results This meta-analysis consisted of five cohort studies and one case-control study, which comprised of 533,514 participants. The pooled relative risk (RR) for incident cancer was 1.24 (95% CI: 1.10-1.39, P=0.0003). The temporal trends analysis demonstrated that an increased risk of cancer was observed during the initial 90 days (RR: 3.44, 95% CI: 2.29-5.57, P<0.00001), but not after that. Lung cancer (RR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.47-1.55, P<0.00001) was associated with NOAF, but not colorectal cancer and breast cancer. Conclusion This meta-analysis provides evidence that NOAF is associated with increased risk of cancer. The risk of incident cancer particularly increases within 90 days after NOAF diagnosis, but not after that.