IntroductionTunas (and tuna-like species) are among the most important fish species commercialized worldwide. Despite the slight decrease recorded in 2019 due to the COVID-19 restrictions, which impacted the export and sashimi markets (FAO 2022b; FAO 2024), tunas reached a record level of annual landings of 8.3 million tonnes in 2022. From a global trade perspective, tunas and tuna-like species (including bonitos and billfishes) worthed €16.2 billion in exports revenue in 2022, which represented roughly 9% of the total value for aquatic animal products exports (FAO 2024).There are seven different tuna species with major commercial importance at a global scale (ISSF 2024). The most globally caught species is skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis , Linnaeus, 1758, SKJ), corresponding to 58% of the total catch, followed by yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares , Bonnaterre, 1788, YFT) with 30% of the global catch, bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus , Lowe, 1839, BET) with 7%, albacore tuna (Thunnus alalunga , Bonnaterre, 1788, ALB) with 4%, and Atlantic Bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus , Linnaeus, 1758, BFT) with only 1% (ISSF 2024). At the global level, all mentioned species are considered Least Concern by the IUCN (Collette et al. 2015a; Collette et al. 2021a; Collette et al. 2021b; Collette et al. 2021d), with the exception of BET which has maintained its Vulnerable conservation status throughout the years (Collette et al. 2021c). However, certain tuna populations may hold a regional conservation status that differs from the global assessment (Collette et al. 2015b).In 2022, 65% of the total tuna catches came from stocks that were not experiencing overfishing, mostly due to SKJ healthy stocks, but 13% still came from overfished YFT, BET, ALB and BFT stocks (ISSF 2024).Tuna can be sold fresh, frozen or cured, and its trade is divided into two main groups of commodities: the first comprised of processed and preserved tuna, mainly canned, and the second comprised of fresh and frozen tuna, mostly for sushi and sashimi markets (Klapper et al. 2023; Silva et al. 2024). The canned tuna market accounts for more than half of global tuna exports, primarily using SKJ and/or YFT, and with the European Union and the United States serving as key markets (Guillotreau et al. 2016). Canned tuna products experienced a decline in 2021 (FAO 2024), but made a robust rebound in 2022, increasing both in value and volume, and this increase is expected to continue over the next decades (Kawamoto 2022). In contrast, the fresh tuna market, which is lower in volume but commands a much higher trade value, has shown increased growth since 2021 (FAO 2024). A major share of this trade corresponds to the tuna sashimi market, which uses mostly BFT and BET (FAO 2022a; Klapper et al. 2023; Servusova and Piskata 2021) and is almost exclusively directed to Japan, which retains 60 to 80% of all global demand (Guillotreau et al. 2016). The market value of tuna species varies considerably depending on factors such as demand, quality, but also the species, origin and conservation status, influencing the allocation of specific species to different markets (Carreiro et al. 2023; Chapela et al. 2007; Kappel et al. 2017; Pecoraro et al. 2020).Over the last years, the importance and need for seafood to be traced back to its origins (traceability) has become evident (Cawthorn and Mariani 2017), with different mechanisms emerging to guarantee transparency and promote sector sustainability (Thorpe et al. 2022). Generally, food authenticity and traceability refers to a product’s taxonomical identification and geographical origins, respectively. The European Union’s regulations (2013) require seafood products in general, to have an indication of the scientific names and commercial designations of the species used in them. However, canned and processed products are excluded from this obligation, and according to the Council Regulation ECC 1536/1992 (1992), only the commercial designation is mandatory. Nevertheless, this regulation not only states that preserved tuna and bonito products must be prepared exclusively from designated species, namely those in the Thunnus genus or SKJ , but also explicitly prohibits the mixing of different species within the same container (1992). Beyond these regulations, companies can voluntarily identify the species used in their products, but some EU countries, such as Spain, impose additional rules, restricting the species that can be canned under each designation and mandating the use of precise labelling on packaging (Klapper et al. 2023).Different studies (Mariani et al. 2015) have suggested that seafood mislabelling is decreasing in European countries, but a study by Sotelo et al. (2018) revealed that 7.84% of canned tuna products, sampled from at least six European countries, incur in mislabelling practices. Incorrect identification and consequent mislabelling of tuna species, either intentionally or unintentionally, results in more than just economic deception of consumers. These errors can have far-reaching implications from inaccurate or erroneous landing reports, stock quota enforcement measures, fish species value, conservation assessments, population’s health parameters, loss of genetic diversity (Pardo et al. 2016), up to impaired sustainability evaluations of a specific fishing industry (Carreiro et al. 2023). Therefore, ensuring accurate species identification is essential for preserving both the economic and the ecological integrity of global tuna fisheries. However, species identification in the tuna canning industry, is particularly challenging since the extensive processing steps often hinder the identification of tuna species through morphological traits (Liu et al. 2016), and identification relies heavily on DNA-based methods (Klapper et al. 2023; Pardo et al. 2016).In Portugal, the canning industry is present in the mainland territory, which represents 80% of the national market, and in the Azores archipelago and, in 2022, the tuna canning industry alone accounted for 32.8% of all fishing and aquaculture processing industry’s production in Portugal (INE 2024). Portugal follows the standard European Union legislation for canned tuna products, and in some canning industries, such as the Azores canning industry, species scientific names are voluntarily indicated in cans, together with the capture origin and fishing methods used. However, the same does not happen for most of the other companies operating in the mainland, and little information is provided in the cans. In light of this, our study aimed to: 1) identify species used by the Portuguese tuna canning industry and determine if any of these species are classified under any conservation status, 2) test whether the canning industry shows any seasonal trends in the tuna species used or if these are randomly sourced throughout the year, 3) assess compliance of this industry with the current legislation, specifically with regards to the mixing of species (1992) within processed products.