Title: Bezafibrate for Severe Refractory Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy: A Case Report and Literature ReviewErika Gandelsman*\RL1,3, Randa Taher*\RL2,3, Rinat Gabbay-Benziv\RL1,3, Fadi Abu Baker\RL2,3*Equal contribution1The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel. 2the Department of Gastroenterology; Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel.3The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, IsraelCorrespondence: Rinat Gabbay-Benziv, MDDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel, 38100Tel: +972-4-6304313, Fax: +972-4-6314916E-mail: rinatg@technion.ac.ilRunning title: Severe Refractory ICP and Fibrate ResponseType of article: Case report and review of the literatureWord count: 1193 wordSummary Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a pregnancy-specific liver disorder associated with pruritus and elevated bile acids, posing significant fetal risks, particularly when total bile acids (TBA) exceed 100 μmol/L. We present a rare case of a 33-year-old patient with early-onset, severe ICP characterized by TBA levels exceeding 400 μmol/L and resistance to multiple lines of standard therapy. Despite ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), rifampin, and cholestyramine treatment, the patient’s response remained suboptimal. At 23 weeks, bezafibrate was initiated, resulting in marked clinical and biochemical improvement, culminating in the normalization of liver enzymes, bile acids, and bilirubin levels. This case highlights the limitations of current ICP therapies and supports further exploration of fibrates as a promising treatment in refractory cases.Introduction Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy \RL)ICP\RL( is the most common hepatic disorder unique to pregnancy, with a reported prevalence of 0.2-2% depending on geographic and ethnic factors(1). It typically presents in the second or third trimester with maternal pruritus and elevated serum total bile acids (TBA), with spontaneous resolution postpartum. Although maternal outcomes are generally benign, ICP carries significant fetal risks—including spontaneous preterm birth, meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF), and stillbirth—especially when TBA concentrations exceed 100 μmol/L(2–4).Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) remains the first-line treatment, with demonstrated efficacy in alleviating maternal symptoms and improving liver function tests (5), though its effect on fetal outcomes remains unproven(6). In treatment-refractory cases or those with severe disease (TBA >100 μmol/L), additional therapies such as rifampin, cholestyramine, and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) may be considered (Hague et al., 2021; Ozkan et al., 2015). Fibrates, well-established in the management of other cholestatic liver diseases, have only recently been explored as a potential therapeutic option for ICP (9). This report describes a case of refractory, early-onset ICP with extreme bile acid elevation and progressive hyperbilirubinemia, successfully managed with bezafibrate.Case Presentation A 33-year-old gravida 4 para 3 woman presented at 19+3 weeks of gestation with generalized pruritus. She had an unremarkable medical and obstetric history with three term uncomplicated vaginal deliveries. She denied taking any medications and had no known history of liver disease. Laboratory testing revealed AST 150 IU/L, ALT 169 IU/L, ALP 148 IU/L, GGT 30 IU/L, total bilirubin 1.8 mg/dL, and markedly elevated TBA of 301 μmol/L. Her platelet count, blood pressure, and urinalysis were normal with no clinical,laboratory or fetal evidence of preeclampsia. A thorough investigation included a liver ultrasound and MRCP which were concluded as normal. Viral hepatitis serologies (HAV, HBV, HCV, HEV, CMV, EBV, HSV), autoimmune markers (ANA, AMA, LKM, ASMA), and metabolic parameters, including ceruloplasmin and immunoglobulin levels, were unremarkable.A diagnosis of ICP was established, and UDCA (15 mg/kg/day) was initiated in combination with cholestyramine. Following a few days of treatment, cholestyramine was discontinued due to intolerance. By 21 weeks of gestation, TBA levels rose to 401 μmol/L, AST to 249 IU/L, ALT to 320 IU/L, and bilirubin to 4.2 mg/dL. Rifampin (150 mg twice daily) was introduced, and UDCA was increased to 20 mg/kg/day. Liver transaminases showed partial improvement, and TBA decreased to 250 μmol/L. However, bilirubin continued to rise, reaching 8.7 mg/dL at 23+4 weeks, prompting rifampin discontinuation.Genetic-indicated amniocentesis revealed markedly turbid amniotic fluid. This unexpected finding raised clinical concern for potential meconium-staining or bile acid-related discoloration.Given the persistence of severe pruritus and ongoing biochemical deterioration, and following the exclusion of autoimmune and other hepatic pathologies, bezafibrate 400 mg daily was initiated. Within 18 days, TBA levels fell below 10 μmol/L, liver enzymes normalized within 3 weeks, and bilirubin decreased progressively to normal levels. The pruritus resolved completely. The patient continued bezafibrate and high-dose UDCA, and delivered a healthy infant at 36+5 weeks of gestation without complications.Discussion This case represents an unusually severe and early presentation of ICP, with TBA levels >400 μmol/L, marked transaminase elevation, and progressive hyperbilirubinemia. The initial treatment with high-dose UDCA, rifampin, and cholestyramine failed to achieve adequate biochemical or symptomatic control. The turning point was the introduction of bezafibrate, which resulted in rapid and sustained improvement across all clinical and laboratory parameters.The association between elevated serum TBA and adverse perinatal outcomes is well documented, However, there is a paucity of data on the highest-risk group—patients with TBA levels exceeding 150–300 μmol/L. Most existing studies analyze risks using broader categories, such as TBA ≥100 μmol/L, but do not provide outcome stratification at more extreme levels. In fact, the literature contains very few detailed reports of maternal or fetal outcomes in ICP patients with TBA above 300 μmol/L(2–4,10–12). This case contributes to bridging that gap by highlighting the importance of assessing both bile acid concentrations and liver function indices in predicting perinatal outcomes.Furthermore, while TBA levels are a critical marker, the presence and severity of liver dysfunction—reflected in markedly elevated transaminases, progressive hyperbilirubinemia, and signs of synthetic impairment—may carry independent prognostic value. Severe hepatic involvement in ICP can worsen maternal morbidity and may be associated with increased fetal risk (2,3). These observations support the need for a broader clinical approach that includes close monitoring of hepatic indices alongside bile acids to better stratify risk and guide management.Table 1 summarizes key studies evaluating fetal and neonatal outcomes in severe ICP based on TBA levels. A threshold of ≥100 μmol/L is consistently associated with increased risks of stillbirth, spontaneous preterm delivery, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and neonatal unit admission. However, no published study to date has systematically examined outcomes in women with TBA above 300 μmol/L, and only a few have addressed the 150–300 μmol/L range in any detail.While UDCA remains the gold standard treatment for ICP, its impact on fetal outcomes remains uncertain (13). Second-line agents such as rifampin may be used for symptom relief but their use is limited by potential hepatotoxicity and concerns about rising bilirubin, as observed in this case (7). In this context, fibrates offer a mechanistically sound alternative. Through PPAR-α activation, they reduce bile acid synthesis and promote bile flow. Bezafibrate is now recommended as first-line pharmacologic therapy for moderate to severe cholestatic pruritus in primary sclerosing cholangitis and is increasingly used in other cholestatic liver diseases—though clinical experience is largely confined to non-pregnant populations. A large cohort study found no malformation risk with short-term fibrate use in pregnancy (14).Grady et al. recently reported two cases of ICP managed with fenofibrate after UDCA failure, both demonstrating substantial clinical and biochemical responses (9). This current case is, to our knowledge, the first published report of bezafibrate use in ICP. The rapid resolution of pruritus and normalization of bile acids and bilirubin following its initiation strongly support its anticholestatic effect.The use of bezafibrate was also considered in light of the patient’s rising bilirubin levels, which are atypical in ICP and more commonly associated with hepatic dysfunction or drug-induced liver injury. Following extensive exclusion of alternative etiologies and in the absence of liver biopsy (deferred due to pregnancy), the favorable response to bezafibrate further supports a cholestatic mechanism.This case underscores the need for expanded therapeutic options for patients with severe, treatment-refractory ICP. While additional data are needed on the safety of fibrates during pregnancy, the present report and others suggest a favorable benefit-risk ratio in select cases, particularly where maternal or fetal risk is high. The absence of complications in this case and a term delivery support the careful consideration of bezafibrate in similar scenarios.Conclusion This case describes a rare and severe form of ICP with extreme TBA levels elevation and marked liver injury, unresponsive to standard therapies. The dramatic and sustained improvement following bezafibrate introduction highlights its potential role in managing refractory ICP. This experience supports the consideration of fibrates as part of a broader, individualized approach. A multidisciplinary strategy remains essential to optimizing maternal and fetal outcomes. Further research is needed to establish the safety, efficacy, and optimal timing of fibrate use in pregnancy.DeclarationAuthor Contributions: EG and RT contributed equally to data collection, manuscript drafting, and literature review. RGB supervised the clinical management and manuscript preparation. FAB provided hepatology consultation and contributed to the discussion and literature analysis. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.Conflicts of interests: All authors declare no conflict of interests.Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Acknowledgements: We thank the patient and her family for their trust and cooperation throughout the management and publication process.Ethical Statement: This case report was conducted in accordance with institutional policies. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and accompanying dataReferences1. Williamson C, Geenes V. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;124(1):120–33.2. Ovadia C, Seed PT, Sklavounos A, Geenes V, Di Illio C, Chambers J, et al. Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses. The Lancet. 2019 Mar 2;393(10174):899–909.3. Geenes V, Chappell LC, Seed PT, Steer PJ, Knight M, Williamson C. Association of severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with adverse pregnancy outcomes: A prospective population-based case-control study. Hepatology. 2014;59(4):1482–91.4. Brouwers L, Koster MPH, Page-Christiaens GCML, Kemperman H, Boon J, Evers IM, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Maternal and fetal outcomes associated with elevated bile acid levels. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan 1;212(1):100.e1-100.e7.5. Ovadia C, Sajous J, Seed PT, Patel K, Williamson NJ, Attilakos G, et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul 1;6(7):547–58.6. Chappell LC, Bell JL, Smith A, Linsell L, Juszczak E, Dixon PH, et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (PITCHES): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2019 Sep 7;394(10201):849–60.7. Hague WM, Callaway L, Chambers J, Chappell L, Coat S, de Haan-Jebbink J, et al. A multi-centre, open label, randomised, parallel-group, superiority Trial to compare the efficacy of URsodeoxycholic acid with RIFampicin in the management of women with severe early onset Intrahepatic Cholestasis of pregnancy: the TURRIFIC randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Dec 1;21(1).8. Ozkan S, Ceylan Y, Ozkan OV, Yildirim S. Review of a challenging clinical issue: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 21;21(23):7134–41.9. Grady J, Clifford C, Treadwell MC, Parikh ND, Satishchandran A. Use of fenofibrate for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. J Hepatol. 2023 Aug;79(2):e84–6.10. Kawakita T, Parikh LI, Ramsey PS, Huang CC, Zeymo A, Fernandez M, et al. Predictors of adverse neonatal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Mosby Inc.; 2015. p. 570.e1-570.e8.11. Rook M, Vargas J, Caughey A, Bacchetti P, Rosenthal P, Bull L. Fetal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in a Northern California cohort. PLoS One. 2012 Mar 5;7(3).12. Sarker M, Zamudio AR, DeBolt C, Ferrara L. Beyond stillbirth: association of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy severity and adverse outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep 1;227(3):517.e1-517.e7.13. Chappell LC, Bell JL, Smith A, Linsell L, Juszczak E, Dixon PH, et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (PITCHES): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2019 Sep 7;394(10201):849–60.14. Kay HY, Jang HY, Kim IW, Oh JM. Fibrates and risk of congenital malformations: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Oct 1;310(4):1967–73.