Adulteration of edible oils poses significant health and economic risks worldwide. This systematic review evaluates the types of adulterants present in edible oils and critically examines analytical detection methods, emphasizing their reliability, sensitivity, and applicability. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy using defined keywords and Boolean operators was applied across PubMed, JSTOR, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus, covering literature from 1965 to 2025. Additional studies were identified through Google Scholar, forward and backward citation tracking, and manual searches of relevant journals via platforms such as ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Wiley Online Library, and Taylor & Francis. National and international regulatory documents, including government gazettes and food safety standards, were also reviewed. Eligible studies were published in English and focused on edible oil adulteration, additives, or detection methodologies involving analytical, spectroscopic, chromatographic, or molecular techniques. Exclusion criteria included duplicates, low-quality studies, inaccessible full texts, insufficient data, and studies on non-edible or industrial oils. The search yielded 460 records. After removing duplicates and screening, 266 articles were assessed by title and abstract, and 198 full texts were sought, of which 86 were unavailable. Of the 112 full-text articles reviewed, 69 were excluded due to poor data reporting, methodological weaknesses, irrelevance, or being in a non-English language. An additional 81 studies were included from previous reviews and other sources, resulting in 123 studies analyzed, and no protocol was registered for this review. A range of modern and traditional methods exists for detecting oil adulteration. However, with the advent of new adulteration methods that are not detectable with conventional quality parameters, continuous improvements and regulations are essential.