Environmental heterogeneity (EH) is widely recognized as a key driver of biodiversity, yet its conceptual foundations remain insufficiently structured. We conducted a systematic review of 194 studies published between 2000 and 2024 to evaluate how EH has been defined, quantified, and analyzed across taxa, regions, and biological disciplines. Although EH was frequently invoked as a central explanatory variable, only a minority of studies provided explicit definitions. Among those that did, definitions were predominantly descriptive, typically referring to environmental “differences” or “variation” without specifying scale, structural properties, or underlying mechanisms. This conceptual looseness was accompanied by substantial diversity in quantification approaches, including habitat-type counts, diversity indices, variance-based measures, and structural complexity metrics, often without explicit alignment between definition and measurement. Despite this variability, most studies reported significant associations between EH and ecological or evolutionary responses. Based in our review, the major limitation of EH research appears not to be a lack of empirical support, but a lack of conceptual integration linking definitions, quantification strategies, and hypothesized mechanisms. We propose an integrative operational definition of EH as spatial and/or temporal variation in abiotic and/or biotic environmental conditions across scales that influences resource availability, environmental filtering, niche differentiation, demographic dynamics, or adaptive processes. Clarifying conceptual alignment is essential for strengthening inference and advancing EH as a predictive and integrative framework in biodiversity science.