How do humans process audiovisual cues for task-switching whilst
walking? An EEG/ERP study.
- Julian Reiser,
- Gerhard Rinkenauer,
- Stefan Arnau,
- Lewis Chuang,
- Edmund Wascher
Julian Reiser
Leibniz-Institut fur Arbeitsforschung an der TU Dortmund
Corresponding Author:reiser@ifado.de
Author ProfileGerhard Rinkenauer
Leibniz-Institut fur Arbeitsforschung an der TU Dortmund
Author ProfileStefan Arnau
Leibniz-Institut fur Arbeitsforschung an der TU Dortmund
Author ProfileLewis Chuang
Technische Universitat Chemnitz Philosophische Fakultat
Author ProfileEdmund Wascher
Leibniz-Institut fur Arbeitsforschung an der TU Dortmund
Author ProfileAbstract
Contemporary work environments require humans to process audiovisual
information displays whilst moving around the world. The attentional
demands associated with using devices such as in-ear headphones and
head-mounted displays may be significantly influenced by varying
locomotor demands, yet this relationship remains poorly understood. This
study investigates the interplay of information presentation modality,
movement state, and cognitive task difficulty. In a virtual reality
laboratory, 22 participants performed a cued task-switch paradigm with
two difficulty levels while standing, walking, or walking with
perturbations on a treadmill. We used a questionnaire, behavioral and
mobile EEG data to investigate cognitive-motor interference. We find
that locomotion interfered with cognitive task performance, and that the
presentation modality of task-switch notification modified the nature of
this interference. While auditory cue presentation resulted in faster
responses under low cognitive load conditions, visual information
presentation was less impaired by higher cognitive and locomotor
demands. A detailed analysis of the EEG response to cues addressed these
differences in terms of multi-modal attentional mechanisms. Hence,
wearable information presentation should be tailored to the specific
needs, particularly for cognitively demanding information in mobile work
settings.09 Jan 2025Submitted to Psychophysiology 09 Jan 2025Submission Checks Completed
09 Jan 2025Assigned to Editor
09 Jan 2025Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
10 Jan 2025Reviewer(s) Assigned