\documentclass[10pt,a4paper,twocolumn]{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[space]{grffile}
\usepackage{latexsym}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{tabulary}
\usepackage{booktabs,array,multirow}
\usepackage{amsfonts,amsmath,amssymb}
\providecommand\citet{\cite}
\providecommand\citep{\cite}
\providecommand\citealt{\cite}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\hypersetup{colorlinks=false,pdfborder={0 0 0}}
\usepackage{etoolbox}
\makeatletter
\patchcmd\@combinedblfloats{\box\@outputbox}{\unvbox\@outputbox}{}{%
  \errmessage{\noexpand\@combinedblfloats could not be patched}%
}%
\makeatother
% You can conditionalize code for latexml or normal latex using this.
\newif\iflatexml\latexmlfalse
\providecommand{\tightlist}{\setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}\setlength{\parskip}{0pt}}%

\AtBeginDocument{\DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.pdf,.PDF,.eps,.EPS,.png,.PNG,.tif,.TIF,.jpg,.JPG,.jpeg,.JPEG}}

\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}


\usepackage{f1000_styles}



\title{From Collaborative Authoring to Collaborative Reviewing}


\author[1]{Josh Nicholson}

\author[2]{Alberto Pepe}


\affil[1]{Authorea}

\affil[2]{Authorea}


\begin{document}

\maketitle
\thispagestyle{fancy}




\clearpage

%\begin{keywords}
%circumstellar matter -- infrared: stars.
%\end{keywords}





\section*{Publishing needs to keep up with research
writing}

{\label{190805}}

Modern research is written collaboratively, online, and with more
accompanying data and media than ever before. The number of
collaborators is going up \cite{Adams_2012} and in many cases the time
to publish is going up as well \cite{Powell_2016} -- it's truly a time
of great change in the research world.~

\par\null

At the same time, researchers have more publication options than ever
before \cite{Larsen_2010}. The proliferation of publication options
means that researchers have endless options for their work. How do
researchers choose the best venue for their work? What happens when the
first venue declines to publish a piece -- how do the authors find an
alternative? How can publishers evolve to these changing demands?~

\par\null

\section*{Most of the time submission is grueling for
authors}

{\label{453266}}

As most seasoned authors know, the submission process is neither easy
nor enjoyable. Often there is a long road ahead of
submit-reject-reformat-submit-revise-resubmit-proof. It's not fun. One
of the most vexing issue for authors is the intense amount of formatting
that goes into conforming to a particular journal style. Submission
requirements are vastly different from publication to publication and
the result is that authors must spend enormous amounts of time preparing
manuscripts.

\par\null

\section*{Enter Authorea}

{\label{214282}}

Authorea is an online document editor that is collaborative and
format-neutral. Authorea helps researchers write a manuscript in a
vanilla style and then output to thousands of styles (see fig
{\ref{391184}}). Authorea users, which number close to
100,000 and are growing daily, may also submit directly to hundreds of
journals.~\selectlanguage{english}
\begin{figure}[h!]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.86\columnwidth]{figures/export-613/export-613}
\caption{{Export to over 41 million+ different styles (\(2^6\cdot\ 3^4\ \cdot\ 8000=41,472,000\)). The
calculation accounts for different options for paper size, columns
number, line numbering, authors \& affiliations details, date, font
type, font size, spacing, figure positioning, and 8,000 is the number of
supported citation styles.
{\label{391184}}%
}}
\end{center}
\end{figure}

\par\null

\section*{How does Authorea direct submission
work?}

{\label{684920}}

Authorea users simply select the output style from a list of vendor
styles or from the manual exporter dialog. Beyond making export and
formatting simple, we've taken extra steps to ease the submission
process for researchers by introducing \textbf{direct submission} to a
\href{https://intercom.help/authorea/publish/how-do-i-directly-submit-to-a-journal}{growing
list of publishers}. With these integrations Authorea formats your
manuscript automatically to the standards required by the journal and
transfers author data collected on Authorea directly into the journal
submission system so you don't have to re-input your affiliations.\selectlanguage{english}
\begin{figure}[h!]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.56\columnwidth]{figures/Screen-Shot-2017-05-01-at-3.04.47-PM/Screen-Shot-2017-05-01-at-3.04.47-PM}
\caption{{Directly submit to the world's leading publishers from Authorea.
{\label{690279}}%
}}
\end{center}
\end{figure}



\par\null\par\null

\section*{Authorea for publishers -- what's available today 100\%
free}

{\label{903222}}

Authorea already makes researchers' lives easier by generating online
documents to the exact spec required by a journal. Authorea is already
integrated with dozens of top journals to provide direct submission
access from Authorea to the world's leading journals -- making it even
easier for authors to focus on producing quality research. Publishers
benefit by receiving very high quality submissions from authors in the
exact format required according to style guidelines.

The way it works:

\begin{enumerate}
\tightlist
\item
  Authorea creates export styles that conform to publisher's various
  styles
\item
  Publisher specifies preferred ingestion method (e.g. RESTful API, FTP,
  etc)
\item
  Authorea builds submission bridge and performs testing
\item
  That's it!
\end{enumerate}

\section*{Authorea for publishers -- what's coming
soon}

{\label{403124}}

In short, Authorea is working to incorporate into its product the
coordination of reviewers, typesetters, and authors around a manuscript.
This process mirrors much of the same things co-authors do when writing
and submitting and we believe that with our system and publisher
cooperation, we can dramatically cut costs associated with typesetting,
speed up review, and make the process more robust and enjoyable for all
stakeholders. Below we highlight what pain points Authorea can solve for
publishers.

\begin{itemize}
\tightlist
\item
  What if instead of having to write line numbers in an email or
  document, we added in-line notations to the document itself? Authorea
  allows authors and reviewers to do that.
\item
  What if authors and publishers could produce professionally typeset
  documents and full JATS XML with one-click and no need for off-shore
  typesetting? Authorea can do that.
\item
  What if we made reviewing for editors and peer reviewers drastically
  easier?
\end{itemize}

We invite editors and publishers to join us towards creating this
future, together. ~The shuffling of PDFs around to reviewers makes
little sense, much like the conversion of Word to PDF to HTML. We want
to fix this. ~If you're interested in partnering with Authorea for a
pilot, please email us at
\href{mailto:hi@authorea.com}{\nolinkurl{hi@authorea.com}}

\selectlanguage{english}
\FloatBarrier
\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
\bibliography{bibliography/converted_to_latex.bib%
}

\end{CJK}\end{document}

