Neighbourhood effects on tree seedlings differ by mycorrhizal symbiont
type in a mixed dipterocarp forest
Abstract
Mycorrhizal symbiont type is an important trait that differentiates tree
species’ responses to their neighbours. In temperate forests, tree
species associated with arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) fungi tend to show
reduced performance in conspecific relative to heterospecific
neighbourhoods, while species associated with ectomycorrhizal (EcM)
fungi do not suffer such negative effects from conspecific neighbours.
However, our understanding of such mycorrhizae-mediated neighbourhood
effects in tropical forests is limited. We address this knowledge gap
through a shade house plant-soil feedback experiment and an
observational field study of seedling dynamics within mixed dipterocarp
(EcM host trees of family Dipterocarpaceae) forests of Sri Lanka. In the
shade house, we transplanted 478 seedlings of three EcM host and two AM
host species into conspecific- and heterospecific-trained soils and
monitored their growth and survival over ~1.5 years. In
the field, we tagged, identified, and measured seedlings in 576 seedling
plots established within known adult neighbourhoods, and monitored
growth and survival over two years beneath conspecific and
heterospecific tree crowns. We found that the response of seedling
growth and survival to neighbourhood (conspecific or heterospecific)
depended on mycorrhizal symbiont type (AM or EcM) in the field, but not
in the shade house, suggesting that above-ground enemies or input from
leaf litter drive neighbourhood effects. AM host seedlings had lower
growth and survival in conspecific vs. heterospecific neighbourhoods in
the field, but the opposite pattern was observed for growth in the shade
house. In contrast, growth and survival of EcM host seedlings did not
vary with neighbourhood type in the field or shade house. These results
support mycorrhizae-mediated neighbourhood effects in tropical mixed
dipterocarp forests. The ability of EcM-host dipterocarp species to
tolerate conspecific neighbours likely contributes to their dominance,
whereas negative effects of conspecific neighbours may allow AM host
seedlings to persist in enemy-free space beneath heterospecific adults.