Background and Purpose. Heroin and cocaine users tailor their dosage, frequency, and method of administration, to maximize the drugs’ effects or prevent withdrawal symptoms. Counterintuitively, preclinical self-administration and choice experiments employ fixed unit-doses and timeouts (after doses) largely resulting in uniform drug-taking patterns. The application of these procedures also disregards the distinct pharmacokinetic properties of heroin and cocaine. This uniformity contrasts with the significantly different ways humans tailor their dosage and frequency of heroin and cocaine use. Here, by combining behavioral and pharmacokinetics assessments we revealed that self-administration procedures lacking the timeout may overcomes this limitation. Experimental Approach. We analyzed heroin and cocaine taking- and seeking-patterns and estimated drug-brain levels in the presence or absence of timeout. We further assessed how absence of timeout and the availability of drug or social peer (access time to the two rewards) affect drug preference in choice procedures. Key Results. Removing the timeout had a profound effect on heroin-taking patterns and seeking, promoting the emergence of burst-like intake, yielding higher brain peak concentrations of heroin. Timeout removal had marginal impact on cocaine taking patterns and seeking. Increasing the access time to the drug in the discrete choice procedure resulted in higher drug intake and increased preference for heroin, but it did not alter cocaine preference. Conclusion and Implications. Removing timeout during self-administration revealed distinct heroin and cocaine taking patterns. Self-administration without timeout and access to high heroin doses during choice more closely mimic human heroin taking patterns and related behaviors, including maladaptive choices.