Environmental DNA shedding rates reveal defecation as a major source of
terrestrial mammal eDNA in surface water bodies
- Gabriele Sauseng,
- Tamara Schenekar
Tamara Schenekar
Karl-Franzens University Graz
Corresponding Author:tamara.schenekar@uni-graz.at
Author ProfileAbstract
not-yet-known
not-yet-known
not-yet-known
unknown
The analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) has become a non-invasive,
cost-efficient and universal biomonitoring tool, widely applied across
the globe. Most eDNA research focuses on aquatic organisms in freshwater
and marine environments. eDNA shedding rates are key to interpretating
eDNA-based results, such as for abundance estimations or detection
probabilities. Shedding rates have been estimated for several species
and life stages, however virtually all of them are aquatic. As
eDNA-based biomonitoring expands to terrestrial systems, waterborne eDNA
from freshwater is increasingly used to assess species presence of
terrestrial mammals. While interacting with the water, terrestrial
mammals deposit their DNA into the water body, with the amount deposited
presumably heavily depending on the interaction type. Here we quantify
eDNA shedding rates from domestic dogs during various interactions with
water bodies, including ”passing by”, ”drinking”, ”crossing through”,
”standing still” and ”defecating.” “Crossing through” and
“defecating” had the highest DNA shedding rates (both approx.
4x107 pg/h/ind). Since scat largely remains in the
water once deposited, and the active movement of terrestrial mammals
through the water is brief, we conclude that defecation is the major
source of terrestrial mammal DNA in surface waters where direct
defecation into the water is possible. This has important implications
for interpretations of eDNA-based data from such water bodies. We also
highlight the patchiness of eDNA particle distribution in such systems,
which needs to be accounted for when designing eDNA sampling schemes.29 Aug 2024Submitted to Molecular Ecology Resources 02 Sep 2024Submission Checks Completed
02 Sep 2024Assigned to Editor
02 Sep 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
10 Sep 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned