loading page

Assessing Bone Regeneration with T-PRF and L-PRF: A Micro-CT Study
  • +2
  • Nilay ÇALIKOĞLU YAŞAR,
  • Gürkan ÜNSAL,
  • Hümeyra Arıkan Kocaelli,
  • Kaan Orhan,
  • Fatma Beyza Sağ
Nilay ÇALIKOĞLU YAŞAR
Istanbul Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi

Corresponding Author:dt.nilaycalikoglu@gmail.com

Author Profile
Gürkan ÜNSAL
Western University Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry
Author Profile
Hümeyra Arıkan Kocaelli
Istanbul Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi
Author Profile
Kaan Orhan
Ankara Universitesi Radyoloji Anabilim Dali
Author Profile
Fatma Beyza Sağ
Istanbul Universitesi Istanbul Tip Fakultesi
Author Profile

Abstract

not-yet-known not-yet-known not-yet-known unknown Aim/Purpose: This study aims to compare the efficacy of locally applied Titanium-Platelet Rich Fibrin (T-PRF) and Leukocyte-Platelet Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) in bone defect healing using micro-CT analysis and histopathological examination in rabbit models. Materials and Methods: Eight healthy male New Zealand rabbits, aged 4-6 months, were utilized. Circular bicortical defects (6 mm diameter) were created at three areas in each rabbit. One of the defects was chosen as the control group received saline solution, while T-PRF and L-PRF were applied to the defect sites in separate experimental groups. Bone regeneration was analyzed using high-resolution micro-CT and histological evaluation post-sacrifice. Statistical analysis assessed the significance of observed differences. Results: Micro-CT analysis revealed significant differences among the groups in bone volume, trabecular thickness, trabecular number, connectivity, and connectivity density (p<0.05). Both T-PRF and L-PRF groups exhibited superior bone parameters compared to controls, with L-PRF showing higher values. Trabecular separation and bone surface area to bone volume ratio did not differ significantly among the groups (p>0.05). Histological examination indicated advanced healing stages in the L-PRF group, suggesting both T-PRF and L-PRF contribute to bone regeneration, with L-PRF demonstrating better effects. Conclusion: The study concludes that while both T-PRF and L-PRF aid in bone regeneration, L-PRF shows superior efficacy. L-PRF is recommended for bone defect healing due to its better performance in enhancing bone parameters.
08 Aug 2024Submitted to Microscopy Research and Technique
19 Aug 2024Submission Checks Completed
19 Aug 2024Assigned to Editor
29 Sep 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
09 Oct 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
25 Oct 2024Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
14 Dec 20241st Revision Received
16 Dec 2024Submission Checks Completed
16 Dec 2024Assigned to Editor
16 Dec 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending