loading page

Evaluating CD1a Immunohistochemistry for Tegumentary Leishmaniasis Diagnosis in the New World: A Focus on Colombia.
  • +4
  • Lucero Katherine Aristizábal-Parra,
  • Juan Pablo Ospina-Gómez,
  • Lina Restrepo-Rivera,
  • Juan David Ramírez,
  • Carlos Mario Ospina-Varón,
  • Juan David González,
  • Héctor Serrano-Coll
Lucero Katherine Aristizábal-Parra
Instituto Colombiano de Medicina Tropical Antonio Roldan Betancur
Author Profile
Juan Pablo Ospina-Gómez
Universidad de Antioquia Facultad de Medicina
Author Profile
Lina Restrepo-Rivera
Instituto Colombiano de Medicina Tropical Antonio Roldan Betancur
Author Profile
Juan David Ramírez
Universidad del Rosario Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matematicas
Author Profile
Carlos Mario Ospina-Varón
Universidad del Rosario Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matematicas
Author Profile
Juan David González
Synlab Colombia SAS
Author Profile
Héctor Serrano-Coll
Instituto Colombiano de Medicina Tropical Antonio Roldan Betancur

Corresponding Author:hserrano@ces.edu.co

Author Profile

Abstract

Introduction: Leishmaniasis, a chronic vector-borne disease caused by parasites of the genus Leishmania, presents diagnostic challenges. Conventional diagnostic methods struggle with accurate visualization of these parasites. Immunostaining with CD1a has demonstrated effectiveness in visualizing Leishmania parasites, particularly in the Old World. However, the application of CD1a immunostaining in Colombian leishmaniasis remains unexplored. Objective: To determine the utility of CD1a as an immunomarker in detecting chronic forms of tegumentary leishmaniasis. Materials and methods: This proof-of-concept study involved 48 paraffin-embedded samples categorized into three groups: moderate-to-high parasite load (n=15), low load (n=15), and chronic granulomatous inflammation (n=13); five samples diagnosed with cutaneous histoplasmosis. These samples were stained with the immunomarker CD1a clone EP3622 for comparative analysis. Additionally, CD1a immunohistochemistry was compared with 18S rDNA qPCR and hematoxylin-eosin staining to evaluate its performance in relation to these established methods. Results: CD1a Immunohistochemistry was positive in 46.51% of the samples evaluated. This immunomarker showed lower sensitivity and negative predictive value than 18S rDNA qPCR and hematoxylin-eosin staining; specificity and negative predictive value were consistent. ROC indicated inferior discrimination for leishmaniasis compared to 18s rDNA qPCR and hematoxylin-eosin staining. Conclusions: Immunohistochemistry for CD1a could be a diagnostic support in the detection of chronic forms of tegumentary leishmaniasis.