loading page

Performance evaluation of polygonal and cylindrical ball mills using discrete element method
  • M. N. Kyalo,
  • James Kimotho,
  • H. N. Ndiritu
M. N. Kyalo
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology School of Mechanical Manufacturing and Materials Engineering

Corresponding Author:mnkyalo@jkuat.ac.ke

Author Profile
James Kimotho
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology School of Mechanical Manufacturing and Materials Engineering
Author Profile
H. N. Ndiritu
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology School of Mechanical Manufacturing and Materials Engineering
Author Profile

Abstract

Ball mills are commonly used in chemical and mineral processing industries for particle size reduction. In mineral processing, cylindrical drums with wear resistant materials are used various operation scales. Polygon shaped mills have found application by artisanal and small-scale miners (ASM) due technological and economic reasons. Evaluating this kind of mills is key in improving or replacing them based on technological data. A modest improvement in grinding efficiency and mill durability can lead to significant economic and environmental benefits. In this study, the performance of polygonal shaped mills was evaluated and compared with cylindrical profiles considering power draw, collision energy dissipation, relative wear and operational stability. Discrete element method (DEM) was used to carry out simulations to describe mechanical behavior of grinding media and the interaction with the mill walls. Polygonal shaped mills without lifters promoted more interparticle interaction with limited centrifuging of particle even at higher speeds compared to cylindrical mills without lifters. Installation of lifters in polygon increased inter-particle collisions and reduce power draw and relative wear. Cylindrical mill with lifters had high interparticle collisions similar to polygonal profile with much lower cumulative relative wear and high operational stability.
11 Mar 2024Submitted to Engineering Reports
10 Jul 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
10 Jul 2024Editorial Decision: Revise Major
20 Sep 20241st Revision Received
07 Oct 2024Assigned to Editor
07 Oct 2024Submission Checks Completed
07 Oct 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
20 Oct 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
22 Oct 2024Editorial Decision: Accept