Arnaud Cerbelaud

and 40 more

The water in Earth’s rivers propagates as waves through space and time across hydrographic networks. A detailed understanding of river dynamics globally is essential for achieving the accurate knowledge of surface water storage and fluxes to support water resources management and water-related disaster forecasting and mitigation. Global in situ information on river flows are crucial to support such an investigation but remain difficult to obtain at adequate spatiotemporal scales, if they even exist. Many expectations are placed on remote sensing techniques as key contributors. Despite a rapid expansion of satellite capabilities, however, it remains unclear what temporal revisit, spatial coverage, footprint size, spatial resolution, observation accuracy, latency time, and variables of interest from satellites are best suited to capture the space-time propagation of water in rivers. Additionally, the ability of numerical models to compensate for data sparsity through model-data fusion remains elusive. We review recent efforts to identify the type of remote sensing observations that could enhance understanding and representation of river dynamics. Key priorities include: (a) resolving narrow water bodies (finer than 50-100 m), (b) further analysis of signal accuracy versus hydrologic variability and relevant technologies (optical/SAR imagery, altimetry, microwave radiometry), (c) achieving 1-3 days observation intervals, (d) leveraging data assimilation and multi-satellite approaches using existing constellations, and (e) new variable measurement for accurate water flux and discharge estimates. We recommend a hydrology-focused, multi-mission observing system comprising: (1) a cutting-edge single or dual-satellite mission for advanced surface water measurements, and (2) a constellation of cost-effective satellites targeting dynamic processes.

Arnaud Cerbelaud

and 8 more

The study of river dynamics has long relied on the analysis of traditional in situ hydrographs. This graphical representation of temporal variability at a given location is so ubiquitous that the mere term “hydrograph” is widely recognized as a time series. While such a “temporal hydrograph” is well suited for in situ data analysis, it fails to represent hydrologic variability across space at a given time; a perspective that characterizes satellite-based hydrologic observations. Here we argue that the concept of “spatial hydrograph” should be the focus of its own dedicated scrutiny. We build “space series” of river discharge and present their analysis in the context of peak flow event detection. We propose the use of peak event spatial coverage, referred to as “length”, as an analog to event duration. Our analysis is performed in the Mississippi basin using a dense in situ network. We reveal that peak flow events range in length from around 75 to 1,800 km with a median (mean) value of 330 (520) km along the basin’s largest rivers. Our analysis also suggests that spatial sampling needs to be a factor of 4 (2) finer in resolution than peak flow lengths to detect 81±13% (70±20%) of events and to estimate their length within 84±3% (67±12%) median accuracy. We evaluate the connection between temporal and spatial scales of peak flows and show that events with longer durations also affect larger extents. We finally discuss the implications for the design of satellite missions concerned with capturing floods across space.