Abstract
Successful plant invasions are often explained by adaptation to novel
environments. However, invasive species usually occupy broad niches
within their native and introduced ranges. A true understanding of
microevolution during invasion therefore requires a wide sampling of
ranges, ideally with a knowledge of introduction history. We tested for
genetic differentiation in herbivore resistance among 128 introduced
(European, North American) and native (Chinese, Japanese) populations of
the invasive Japanese knotweed (Reynoutria japonica) in two
common gardens in the native range. In both common gardens, we found
that the resistance traits of the introduced populations differed from
most Chinese native populations but not from native populations in
Japan, which are the two putative sources of introduction. Compared to
Chinese populations, introduced European populations had thicker leaves
in both common gardens with a lower C: N ratio but higher flavonoids
content in the Shanghai garden. In the native range, variation in
herbivore resistance was much more strongly associated with climate of
origin than in introduced populations. Our results support that
introducing particular resistance phenotypes from Japan played a key
role in the invasion of knotweed into Europe and North America. Our
study demonstrates how knowledge of introduction history can avoid
misinterpretations of observed biogeographic divergence.