AUTHOREA
Log in Sign Up Browse Preprints
LOG IN SIGN UP
Matthias C.  Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig

Public Documents 2
Moving restoration ecology forward with combinatorial approaches
Matthias C.  Rillig
Anika Lehmann

Matthias Rillig

and 4 more

May 05, 2024
Our current planetary crisis moves the need for effective ecosystem restoration centerstage and compels us to explore unusual options. We here propose exploring combinatorial approaches to restoration practices: management practices are drawn at random and combined from a locally relevant pool of possible management interventions, thus creating an experimental gradient in the number of interventions. This will move the current degree of interventions to higher dimensionality, opening new opportunities for unlocking unknown synergistic effects. In this concept, regional restoration hubs play an important role as guardians of locally relevant information and sites of experimental exploration. Data collected from such studies could feed into a global database, which could be used to learn about general principles of combined restoration practices, helping to refine future experiments. Such combinatorial approaches to exploring restoration intervention options may be our best hope yet to achieve decisive progress in ecological restoration at the timescale needed to mitigate and reverse the most severe losses.
How widespread use of generative AI for images and video can affect the environment a...
Matthias C.  Rillig
India Mansour

Matthias C. Rillig

and 5 more

March 09, 2024
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) models will have broad impacts on society including the scientific enterprise; ecology and environmental science will be no exception. Here we discuss the potential opportunities and risks of advanced generative AI for visual material (images and video) for ecology and the environment. There are clearly opportunities for positive impacts, related to improved communication, for example; we also see possibilities for ecological research to profit from generative AI (e.g., image gap filling, biodiversity surveys, and improved citizen science). However, there are also risks, threatening to undermine the credibility of our science, mostly related to actions of bad actors, for example in terms of spreading fake information or committing fraud. Risks need to be mitigated at the level of government regulatory measures, but we also highlight what can be done right now, including discussing issues with the next generation of ecologists, and transforming towards radically open science workflows.

| Powered by Authorea.com

  • Home