Evaluation of the prognostic value of lymphadenectomy in low-grade
serous ovarian cancer: A case-control multicenter retrospective study
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the effect of lymphadenectomy on
clinical outcome in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer
(LGSOC). Design: Case-control multicenter retrospective study. Setting:
University Hospital-based research center. Population: 147 patients with
LGSOC. Methods: Propensity score matching (PSM) algorithm was used to
balance the basic characteristics of patients with lymphadenectomy or
not, and the Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the impact of
clinical prognosis. Finally, univariate and multivariate Cox
proportional hazards regression analysis were performed to analyze the
high-risk factors associated with clinical prognosis. Main outcome
measures: Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results: A total of 147 women from 4 medical centers were enrolled. In
the before matching cohort, 101 (68.7%) patients underwent
lymphadenectomy. Fifty-two (35.4%) patients experienced recurrence, and
25 (17%) patients died. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was no
significant difference in DFS(P=0.058) and OS(P=0.067) in the after
matching cohort. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed age
(P=0.012), the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics
(FIGO) stage (P=0.031) and effective cytoreductive surgery (P=0.044)
were 3 high-risk factors associated with recurrence. Age (P=0.031) and
effective cytoreductive surgery (P=0.009) were 2 high-risk factors
associated with death. Conclusions: Lymphadenectomy seems not to provide
a significant benefit neither DFS nor OS in our study. Age, the FIGO
stage and effective cytoreductive surgery are high-risk factors
associated with clinical prognosis in LGSOC patients.