Increases in blade size and mass necessitates the reexamination of modeling assumptions in various disciplines. The accuracy of the responses produced from a geometrically exact beam model largely depends on how well the cross-sectional analysis is handled. However, most cross-sectional meshing tools do not account for the adhesive bond lines or joints that typical wind blade manufacturing requires. Adhesives layers can reach 30 mm in thickness and generous amounts of adhesive “squeeze out” can introduce high uncertainty in the adhesive widths. In this work, not only are adhesive layers accounted for, but a sensitivity analysis is also performed on the aeroelastic response of a turbine with 100m-long blades. The cross-sectional meshing capabilities of a new code called pyNuMAD is established. Stiffness and mass matrices are found to be consistent with a validated cross-sectional tool called SONATA. Aeroelastic sensitives to adhesive thicknesses and widths at the webs and trailing edges are presented. Adhesives were found to reduce twist deformation by up to 5%. Loads along the blade span were found to be nonconservative in most cases. In general, the trailing edge adhesive tends to have greater impact on blade response when compared to web adhesives, but this observation seems less certain at higher wind speeds. Accounting for adhesives in aeroelastic simulations is recommended.