Examining the heuristics and biased in mental arithmetic: Behavioral and
ERP evidence
Abstract
The Operational Momentum (OM) effect refers to the tendency to
overestimate addition and underestimate subtraction outcomes during
mental arithmetic, however, whether OM effect arises from multiple
competing sources remains unclear. To explore the mechanism of OM
effect, based on the theory of operand encoding in Triple Code Model
(TCM), we divide operands into magnitude encoding and verbal encoding,
and compare the differences of OM-congruent probe and OM-incongruent
probe at behavioral and electrophysiological level under different
encoding conditions. We found that in the magnitude encoding condition,
participants exhibited a stable OM effect, and OM-congruent probes
elicited a positive P3 component (250–350ms) in the parietal lobes,
while OM-incongruent probes triggered a more negative N2 component
(150–250ms) in the parietal lobes. In the verbal encoding condition,
participants exhibited a reserved OM effect and OM-incongruent probes
elicited a more negative N2 component (150–250ms) in the frontal lobes.
These results indicate OM effect arises from multiple competing sources
of bias in mental arithmetic, which is consistent with the assumptions
of the AHAB model.