loading page

Shear Wave Elastography in Adnexal Masses: Is there any role?
  • +5
  • Smita Manchanda,
  • Gurkawal Kaur,
  • Raju Sharma,
  • Surabhi Vyas,
  • Devasenathipathy Kandasamy,
  • Smriti Hari,
  • Neerja Bhatla,
  • Sandeep Mathur R
Smita Manchanda
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Radiodiagnosis

Corresponding Author:smitamanchanda@gmail.com

Author Profile
Gurkawal Kaur
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Radiodiagnosis
Author Profile
Raju Sharma
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Radiodiagnosis
Author Profile
Surabhi Vyas
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Radiodiagnosis
Author Profile
Devasenathipathy Kandasamy
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Radiodiagnosis
Author Profile
Smriti Hari
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Radiodiagnosis
Author Profile
Neerja Bhatla
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Author Profile
Sandeep Mathur R
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Pathology
Author Profile

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the role of Shear wave elastography in characterizing adnexal masses. Design A prospective study. Setting Tertiary care hospital and research institute in India. Population Patients aged >12 years with an adnexal mass. Methods 95 adnexal masses in 85 patients were included in the analysis. The mean, minimum, and maximum elasticity values of the solid component of the mass and the ratio of the mean elasticity of the mass and myometrium were compared between benign and malignant adnexal masses and in different subgroups. In 91masses, histopathology was the gold standard, while in four of the masses, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was the gold standard. Main outcome measures Shear wave elastography parameters. Results No statistically significant difference was observed in the elasticity parameters between benign and malignant adnexal masses. In the analysis of subgroups, a statistically significant difference was observed in the mean and maximum elasticity values between benign non-neoplastic masses and neoplastic masses (p = 0.047). The rest of the subgroups had no statistically significant difference in the elasticity parameters. Conclusion Shear wave elastography did not contribute significantly to the characterization of adnexal masses.