Biogeographic affiliation and centers of richness as predictors of
elevational range-size patterns for Malesian flora
Abstract
Our goal was to interrogate Janzen’s idea that “mountain passes are
higher in the tropics” by investigating putative ecological and
biogeographic drivers of patterns of elevational range-sizes among
equatorial plant families. We used herbarium records for sixty
species-rich plant families, representing a total of 18535 species, to
estimate distributions over a 4500 m elevational gradient. For each
family, we estimated the change in average range-sizes with increasing
elevation (i.e. Rapoport’s rule, abbreviated as ERR) and quantified 15
metrics of familial richness distribution, evolutionary age, and
biogeographic affiliation. We visualized covariation across families
using used phylogenetic principal components analysis (pPCA), with color
illustrating endemism. We then evaluated how family-level ERR slopes
correlated with each metric individually, and the first two pPCA
components, using phylogenetic independent contrasts. Families with
greater Sundaland endemism, or richness that was restricted to tropical
lowland forests, had positive ERR slopes. Families with stronger Sahul
affiliation, or montane centered richness, had shallower, neutral, or
negative ERR slopes. Families with Wallacea affiliation, broader
latitudinal or elevational distributions, cosmopolitanism, or older
evolutionary age had mixed results. Our findings support Janzen’s
hypothesis that “mountain passes are higher in the tropics.” If long
term climate stability over millions of years promotes habitat
specialization, then among taxa with long-term tropical affiliations, we
would expect smaller range-sizes within lowland forests, with range-size
expansion towards higher elevations, expressed as a positive ERR slope.
Conversely, variation in growing conditions should promote larger,
relatively consistent, range-sizes expressed as a neutral ERR slope. Our
results support this corollary because of the dichotomy of ERR slopes
observed in relation to elevational and historical biogeographic
positioning, which may be an indicator of vulnerability of these plant
groups to contemporary climate change.