loading page

Altered desensitization and internalization patterns of rodent versus human GIP receptors -- a major drug discovery challenge
  • +9
  • Lærke Gasbjerg,
  • Rasmus Rasmussen,
  • Adrian Dragan,
  • Peter Lindquist ,
  • Josefine Melchiorsen,
  • Sine Schiellerup,
  • Esther Tordrup,
  • Sarina Gadgaard,
  • Hüsün Kizilkaya,
  • Bolette Hartmann,
  • Jens Holst,
  • Mette Rosenkilde
Lærke Gasbjerg
University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
Author Profile
Rasmus Rasmussen
University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
Author Profile
Adrian Dragan
University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
Author Profile
Peter Lindquist
University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
Author Profile
Josefine Melchiorsen
University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
Author Profile
Sine Schiellerup
University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
Author Profile
Esther Tordrup
University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
Author Profile
Sarina Gadgaard
University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
Author Profile
Hüsün Kizilkaya
University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
Author Profile
Bolette Hartmann
University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
Author Profile
Jens Holst
University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
Author Profile
Mette Rosenkilde
University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences

Corresponding Author:rosenkilde@sund.ku.dk

Author Profile

Abstract

Background and Purpose The gut hormone glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) signals via the GIP receptor (GIPR) resulting in postprandial processes such as potentiation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Translation of results from rodent to human studies has, however, been challenged by contradictive therapeutic effects of GIPR-targeting compounds. We, therefore, investigated the variation between species focusing on GIPR desensitization and the role of the C-terminus. Experimental Approach Species variants of the GIPR were studied in vitro for endogenous ligand affinity, G protein activation (cAMP accumulation), recruitment of beta-arrestin, and internalization. Variants of the mouse, rat, and human GIPRs with swapped C-terminal tails were studied in parallel. Key Results The human GIPR is more prone to internalization than rodent GIPRs. Despite similar agonist affinities and potencies for Gαs-activation especially the mouse GIPR has a reduced receptor desensitization, internalization, and beta-arrestin recruitment. Using an enzyme-stable, long-acting GIP analogue, the species differences were even more pronounced. “Tail swapped” human, rat, and mouse GIPRs were all fully functional in their Gαs-coupling and the mouse GIPR regained internalization and beta-arrestin 2-recruitment properties with the human tail while the human GIPR lost the ability to recruit beta-arrestin 2 when its own C-terminus was replaced by the rat or mouse tail. Conclusion and Implications Desensitization of the human GIPR is dependent on the C-terminal tail. The diverse functionality of the C-terminal tail as well as receptor internalization patterns between species, especially human and mouse GIPRs, are important factors that could influence the preclinical therapeutic evaluation of GIPR targeting compounds.