Abstract
Trophic cascades are important determinants of food web dynamics and
functioning, yet mechanisms explaining variations in trophic cascade
strength remain elusive. Here we combine a mesocosm experiment
(phytoplankton-zooplankton-shrimp) and theoretical models to disentangle
the relative importance of two processes driving trophic cascade:
primary productivity (productivity hypothesis) and energy transfer
efficiency (energy transfer hypothesis). Our experimental systems showed
consistently positive effects of trophic cascade across mesocosms with
different nutrient inputs and zooplankton communities. Moreover, the
strength of trophic cascade increased with the energy transfer
efficiency between herbivores and predators, but did not change with the
primary productivity. These findings are further corroborated by our
analyses of food chain models in more general settings. Combined, our
results support the energy transfer hypothesis but falsify the
productivity hypothesis. Our study contributes an integrative
perspective to reconcile energetic and population dynamics in food webs,
which has useful implications for ecosystem management.