Reaching and implementing the best available knowledge in wildlife
biology
- Tomas Willebrand,
- Scott Newey
Tomas Willebrand
Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences
Corresponding Author:tomas.willebrand@inn.no
Author ProfileAbstract
Wildlife biology is an applied discipline, where research results are to
varying degree incorporated to accepted knowledge However, several
factors appear to increase the divide between research results, and
knowledge and implementation. First, there is an exponential increase in
number of published papers, in part driven by misguided reliance on
publication record for assessing scientific competence. The shear number
of publications risk diluting knowledge through salami-slicing or simply
making it difficult to find relevant publications. This development
could be problematic for the future of wildlife biology, and it has made
complex statistical analysis of already available data more profitable
than the ability to generate new data in robust field studies. Research
results are conceptually different from knowledge and need to be
evaluated in a post-publication process to become knowledge. Secondly,
the formulation of research questions has become restricted by the way
research is organised and funded. A shift from a focus on individual
performance to research groups could encourage the development of more
complex research questions that are better suited to advance the
knowledge of wildlife biology. Funding agencies and research
institutions need to think beyond current norm of a three year funding
package. Thirdly, defining knowledge as the result of a post-publishing
evaluating of research publications would facilitate knowledge transfer
between researchers and practitioners. It is well established that a
two-way transfer of knowledge and experience is beneficial to both
researchers and practitioners but the low return on academic recognition
for such efforts is currently simply too low, which positively
discourages researchers from dividing limited resources into such
activities. Only academic institutions and funding agencies together can
make the significant changes needed as have begun in other disciplines.
However, researchers also need to embrace existing and emerging
initiatives such as Open Sceince, FAIRdata, CREDIT authorship to
accelerate change.Submitted to Wildlife Biology 09 Feb 2024Assigned to Editor
09 Feb 2024Submission Checks Completed
09 Feb 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
10 Feb 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
03 Apr 2024Editorial Decision: Revise Major
28 May 20241st Revision Received
30 May 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
16 Jun 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
17 Jun 2024Editorial Decision: Accept