loading page

Selection changes productivity over time
  • +3
  • William Godsoe,
  • Ryosuke Iritani,
  • Andrew Letten,
  • Elena Moltchanova,
  • Rua Murray,
  • Philipp Wacker
William Godsoe
Lincoln University

Corresponding Author:william.godsoe@lincoln.ac.nz

Author Profile
Ryosuke Iritani
RIKEN
Author Profile
Andrew Letten
The University of Queensland
Author Profile
Elena Moltchanova
University of Canterbury
Author Profile
Rua Murray
University of Canterbury College of Engineering
Author Profile
Philipp Wacker
University of Canterbury
Author Profile

Abstract

Experiments suggest that increasing species’ diversity increases productivity over short observation periods. Theory predicts that diversity may increases productivity at equilibrium, such as in communities of coexisting competitors. In effect, experiment and theory are using different response variables. We illustrate how this gap can obscure some of the mechanisms through which diversity shapes productivity. To do this, we propose a formal link to dynamic models of population growth. Using this link, we show that selection (as it is formally defined in dynamic models) does not affect productivity. Instead, selection changes productivity over time. In contrast, niche complementarity can change productivity directly. We illustrate how to measure each of the terms in competition experiments. These results highlight how the effects of diversity on productivity can be obscured by our choice of response variable.
30 Sep 2024Submitted to Ecology Letters
01 Oct 2024Submission Checks Completed
01 Oct 2024Assigned to Editor
01 Oct 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
04 Oct 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned