loading page

Association of increased fetal epicardial fat thickness with maternal pregestational and gestational diabetes
  • +5
  • Baris Sever,
  • Burak Bayraktar,
  • Duygu Adiyaman,
  • Hakan Golbasi,
  • Ibrahim Omeroglu,
  • Saygin Colak,
  • Halil Pala,
  • Atalay Ekin
Baris Sever
Izmir Il Saglik Mudurlugu Izmir Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Tepecik Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi

Corresponding Author:drbarissever@gmail.com

Author Profile
Burak Bayraktar
Izmir Il Saglik Mudurlugu Izmir Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Tepecik Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi
Author Profile
Duygu Adiyaman
Izmir Il Saglik Mudurlugu Izmir Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Tepecik Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi
Author Profile
Hakan Golbasi
Izmir Il Saglik Mudurlugu Izmir Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Tepecik Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi
Author Profile
Ibrahim Omeroglu
Izmir Il Saglik Mudurlugu Izmir Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Tepecik Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi
Author Profile
Saygin Colak
Izmir Il Saglik Mudurlugu Izmir Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Tepecik Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi
Author Profile
Halil Pala
Izmir Il Saglik Mudurlugu Izmir Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Tepecik Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi
Author Profile
Atalay Ekin
Izmir Il Saglik Mudurlugu Izmir Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Tepecik Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi
Author Profile

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the changes of fetal epicardial fat thickness (EFT) in pregnancies with pregestational (PGDM) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to identify the diagnostic effectiveness of fetal EFT in differentiating PGDM and GDM from normal pregnancies. Methods: The study was conducted with pregnant women who admitted to perinatology department between November 2020 and September 2022. Patients were analyzed as 3 groups: PGDM (n=161), GDM (n=171) and control group (n=170). EFT was measured in all three groups at 29 weeks of gestation. Demographic characteristics and ultrasonographic findings were recorded and compared. Results: The mean fetal EFT was significantly higher in PGDM (1.47±0.083 mm, p<0.001) and GDM (1.40±0.082 mm, p<0.001) groups compared to control group (1.19±0.049 mm) and was also significantly higher in PGDM group than GDM group (p<0.001). Fetal EFT was significantly positively correlated with maternal age, fasting, 1 st hour, 2 nd hour glucose values, HbA1c, fetal abdominal circumference and deepest vertical pocket of amniotic fluid (p<0.001). Fetal EFT value of 1.3 mm diagnosed PGDM patients with a sensitivity of 97.3% and a specificity of 98.2%. Fetal EFT value of 1.27 mm diagnosed GDM patients with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 95%. Conclusions: Fetal EFT is greater in pregnancies with diabetes than in normal pregnancies, and also greater in PGDM than in GDM. In addition, fetal EFT is strongly correlated with maternal blood glucose levels in diabetic pregnancies.
31 Dec 2023Published in The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine volume 36 issue 1. 10.1080/14767058.2023.2183474