Maria Dance

and 4 more

Aim: Rangifer tarandus L. play a key role in Arctic ecosystems as the most numerous and widespread large herbivore. Sea ice is vital for maintaining genetic connectivity in Arctic islands, yet the historical role of sea ice in shaping Rangifer biogeography is unknown. We study the timing of island dispersal and the role of sea ice changes and ice sheet retreat since the last glacial period. Methods: We compiled published datasets of mitochondrial DNA sequences which informed population history scenarios, evaluated in a coalescent-based approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) modelling framework to test hypotheses of island (re)colonisation and to estimate timings of divergence and admixture. Population events were compared with modelled and proxy-based paleo-sea ice cover and published ice sheet chronologies. Results: Our analysis supports Holocene dispersal onto deglaciated Arctic islands rather than High Arctic glacial refugia. The degree of population admixture and the effect of sea ice was dependent on regional geography and climate history. North American initial island population divergence occurred as sea ice cover was declining. A lack of strong genetic structure and late Holocene admixture suggest that island populations were somewhat connected by sea ice during the Holocene. The Svalbard and West Greenland divergence times lagged deglaciation but broadly align with fossil-based estimates of colonisation, suggesting dispersal limitation due to sea ice conditions, potentially modulated by ocean currents and sea ice drift. Main conclusions: Our study sheds light on the Late Quaternary (~60 ka - present) history of Arctic island Rangifer and suggests that ice sheet retreat, sea ice cover, and ocean currents were important in shaping present-day genetic patterns. Regional differences in postglacial dynamics suggest that dispersal during contemporary climate change may vary regionally and depend upon decreasing connectivity provided by sea ice.

Natalie J Burls

and 23 more

The Miocene epoch, spanning 23.03-5.33Ma, was a dynamic climate of sustained, polar amplified warmth. Miocene atmospheric CO2 concentrations are typically reconstructed between 300-600ppm and were potentially higher during the Miocene Climatic Optimum (16.75-14.5Ma). With surface temperature reconstructions pointing to substantial midlatitude and polar warmth, it is unclear what processes maintained the much weaker-than-modern equator-to-pole temperature difference. Here we synthesize several Miocene climate modeling efforts together with available terrestrial and ocean surface temperature reconstructions. We evaluate the range of model-data agreement, highlight robust mechanisms operating across Miocene modelling efforts, and regions where differences across experiments result in a large spread in warming responses. Prescribed CO2 is the primary factor controlling global warming across the ensemble. On average, elements other than CO2, such as Miocene paleogeography and ice sheets, raise global mean temperature by ~ 2℃, with the spread in warming under a given CO2 concentration (due to a combination of the spread in imposed boundary conditions and climate feedback strengths) equivalent to ~1.2 times a CO2 doubling. This study uses an ensemble of opportunity: models, boundary conditions, and reference datasets represent the state-of-art for the Miocene, but are inhomogeneous and not ideal for a formal intermodel comparison effort. Acknowledging this caveat, this study is nevertheless the first Miocene multi-model, multi-proxy comparison attempted so far. This study serves to take stock of the current progress towards simulating Miocene warmth while isolating remaining challenges that may be well served by community-led efforts to coordinate modelling and data activities within a common analysis framework.