Philip Goodwin

and 3 more

Climate feedbacks, including Planck, surface albedo, water vapor-lapse rate (WVLR) and cloud feedbacks, determine how much surface temperatures will eventually warm to balance anthropogenic radiative forcing. Climate feedbacks remain difficult to constrain directly from temporal variation in observed surface warming and radiation budgets due to the short historical record and low signal-to-noise ratio, with only order 1{degree sign}C historic rise in surface temperatures and high uncertainty in aerosol radiative forcing. This study presents a new method to analyze climate feedbacks from observations by empirically fitting simplified reduced-physics relations for outgoing radiation at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) to observed spatial variation in climate properties and radiation budgets. Spatial variations in TOA outgoing radiation are dominated by the dependence on surface temperature: around 85% of the spatial variation in clear sky albedo, and 78% of spatial variation in clear sky TOA outgoing longwave radiation, is functionally explained by variation in surface temperatures. These simplified and observationally constrained relations are then differentiated with respect to spatial contrasts in surface temperature to reveal the Planck, surface albedo (λ_abedo) and WVLR (λ_WVLR) climate feedbacks spatially for both clear sky and all sky conditions. The resulting global all sky climate feedback values are λ_WVLR=1.30 (1.20 to 1.40 at 66%) Wm-2K-1, and λ_abedo=0.60 (0.53 to 0.66) Wm-2 for the 2003-2023 period reducing to 0.32 (0.28 to 0.35) Wm-2K-1 under 4{degree sign}C warming after cryosphere retreat. Our findings agree well with complex Earth system model evaluations based on temporal climate perturbations, and our approach is complementary.

Philip Goodwin

and 3 more

Climate feedbacks determine how much surface temperatures will eventually warm to balance anthropogenic radiative forcing, but remain difficult to constrain. The climate feedback due to some process X is defined as the partial derivative of outgoing radiation at the top of the atmosphere with respect to surface temperature following a change in X, λX=-∂Rout/TS|X, with total climate feedback a summation from all processes, λtotal=∑λX. Standard approaches evaluate climate feedbacks from finite temporal changes in surface temperatures and outgoing radiation, following observed or simulated perturbations to climate state. However, this introduces significant linear combination error (λtotal≠∑λX) when the applied perturbation is large enough to achieve a good signal-to-noise ratio. This study presents a new semi-empirical evaluation of non-cloud climate feedbacks, constrained instead by spatial variation in outgoing radiation and climate state. First, we observationally constrain functional relations for outgoing radiation over ocean and land in terms of surface temperature, pressure, relative humidity, the height of the tropopause, fractional clound amount and latitude. Then, these functional relations are differentiated with respect to surface temperature to calculate the climate feedbacks for infinitesimal perturbation, eliminating linear combination error at high signal-to-noise ratio. We find, when combined with a recent cloud feedback estimate, a present-day total climate feedback of -0.99 (-0.75 to -1.22 at 66% range) Wm-2K-1. Our method is independent of temporal variation approaches to evaluate climate feedback allowing Bayesian combination to further reduce uncertainty.