Please note: We are currently experiencing some performance issues across the site, and some pages may be slow to load. We are working on restoring normal service soon. Importing new articles from Word documents is also currently unavailable. We apologize for any inconvenience.

loading page

Characterizing Episodic Tremor and Slip in Cascadia
  • Noel Bartlow,
  • Charles Williams
Noel Bartlow
University of California Berkeley

Corresponding Author:nbartlow@berkeley.edu

Author Profile
Charles Williams
GNS Science
Author Profile

Abstract

Episodic Tremor and Slip, or ETS, occurs frequently in Cascadia with recurrence intervals of roughly 8-22 months for large ETS. Characterizing these events is critical to our understanding of subduction plate interface mechanics, plate motion budgets, and the potential for damaging earthquakes. Here we combine a novel technique for separating ETS and inter-ETS velocities with the Network Inversion Filter [Segall and Matthews,1997; McGuire and Segall, 2003; Miyazaki et al., 2006] to fully characterize ETS slip using daily GPS time series. The velocity separation technique allows for an inversion of the stacked, time-averaged ETS velocities to obtain a time-averaged ETS slip rate on the plate interface for the last 10-20 year time period. These time-averaged velocities are directly comparable to plate rate to characterize the overall slip budget. We use time dependent NIF inversions with our newly derived inter-ETS velocities to create a catalog of ETS events. Slip and tremor track closely in all ETS events, consistent with prior results [Bartlow et al., 2011; Wech and Bartlow, 2014]. We generate heterogenous elastic Green’s functions for both of our inversions using the PyLith finite element code [Aagaard et al., 2013], based on the velocity model of Stephenson [2007] to better estimate slip amplitudes. We find that while 75-100% of the plate rate is accommodated in the northern segment, consistent with prior results [Chapman and Melbourne, 2009], in the central segment and parts of the southern segment ETS accommodates only 0-50% of the plate rate, leaving additional slip to be released as inter-ETS creep, in an earthquake, as posteseismic relaxation, or as ETS slip at other points in the megathrust earthquake cycle. Currently published locking models [Schmalzle et al., 2014; Pollitz and Evans, 2017] indicate that inter-ETS creep is likely to take up most of the remaining slip budget, but some coupling may remain in the ETS zone.